Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Mon, 09 July 2007 21:37 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I80v3-0007wS-Uk for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:37:22 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I80v3-0002ud-HE for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:37:21 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1I80pX-0007AZ-MG for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:31:39 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
Received: from [213.46.255.22] (helo=viefep17-int.chello.at) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <hhelvoort@chello.nl>) id 1I80pD-00076r-K0 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:31:25 +0000
Received: from [192.168.17.2] (really [62.195.168.62]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070709152717.EXUV9412.viefep14-int.chello.at@[192.168.17.2]>; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:27:17 +0200
Message-ID: <469253D4.9070407@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:27:16 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
References: <003601c7b469$e8a239e0$374d460a@china.huawei.com> <008b01c7b67f$4e106e70$c6bea8c0@your029b8cecfe>
In-Reply-To: <008b01c7b67f$4e106e70$c6bea8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Hi, I support this I-D to become WG-draft. Cheers, Huub. ===================== Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi, > > In Prague we found that there was some support for this work, and no > opposition. > > There were questions regarding clarifying that the work does not define > new process or procedures, but explains how existing procedures (i.e. > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-08.txt) can be applied in a variety of > situations. I think that this revision has included this clarification. > > There was a request to broaden the draft to cover all scenarios (not > just multi-node as before), and this has been done. > > There was concern about whether there was "service provider" interest in > this work. In fact, several of the hands raised to express interest > worked for service providers. But I am not personally convinced that > this Informational work needs strong support from that sector. More to > the point would be support from the vendors who need to agree how they > will operate draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext. > > So, I'd like to ask the WG whether there is support to make this I-D a > WG draft. > If we do, I would like to see it complete quite quickly. It would need: > - review by vendors to make sure it is accurate > - a bit more text on security issues > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com> > To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Farrel, Adrian" > <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <asatyana@cisco.com> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:08 AM > Subject: New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt > > >> Dear CCAMPers, >> >> We have published a "new" I-D: >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt >> >> This I-D replaces the previous I-D >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-01.txt. >> >> According to the discussion in Prague meeting, we have: >> 1) Changed draft to be Informational. Mainly rewords the draft to make >> sure that it does not give instructions that could be interpreted as >> defining the procedures. >> 2) The title of the I-D has been changed to "Description of the >> RSVP-TE Graceful Restart Procedures", in order to wide the scope of >> this I-D to include the single node graceful restart scenario. >> >> Best regards, >> Dan Li > > > > -- ================================================================ http://www.van-helvoort.eu/ ================================================================ Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
- New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt Dan Li
- Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt … Adrian Farrel
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Lucy Yong
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Young Lee
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Greg Bernstein
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Mach Chen
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Diego Caviglia (GA/ERI)
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Bardalai, Snigdho
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… fabien.verhaeghe
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Zhang Renhai
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Dan Li
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Arun Satyanarayana
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel