Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
Dan Li <danli@huawei.com> Sun, 08 July 2007 15:29 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7YhW-0003uC-CO for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:29:30 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7YhW-00069K-1i for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:29:30 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1I7YYr-000Kmk-Pa for ccamp-data@psg.com; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:20:33 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
Received: from [61.144.161.55] (helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <danli@huawei.com>) id 1I7YYe-000Kkv-4m for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:20:28 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JKV003QN99U4Q@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:20:18 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dan (3.123.40.59.broad.sz.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.40.123.3]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JKV00C9A99T1O@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:20:18 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:17:21 +0800
From: Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>, Arun Satyanarayana <asatyana@cisco.com>
Message-id: <003e01c7c173$7dbb3890$6401a8c0@dan>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type="response"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <003601c7b469$e8a239e0$374d460a@china.huawei.com> <008b01c7b67f$4e106e70$c6bea8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5
Hi, As a co-author of this draft, I should say YES! Thanks, Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com>; "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <asatyana@cisco.com> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:40 PM Subject: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D? > Hi, > > In Prague we found that there was some support for this work, and no > opposition. > > There were questions regarding clarifying that the work does not define > new process or procedures, but explains how existing procedures (i.e. > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-08.txt) can be applied in a variety of > situations. I think that this revision has included this clarification. > > There was a request to broaden the draft to cover all scenarios (not just > multi-node as before), and this has been done. > > There was concern about whether there was "service provider" interest in > this work. In fact, several of the hands raised to express interest worked > for service providers. But I am not personally convinced that this > Informational work needs strong support from that sector. More to the > point would be support from the vendors who need to agree how they will > operate draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext. > > So, I'd like to ask the WG whether there is support to make this I-D a WG > draft. > If we do, I would like to see it complete quite quickly. It would need: > - review by vendors to make sure it is accurate > - a bit more text on security issues > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com> > To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Farrel, Adrian" > <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <asatyana@cisco.com> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:08 AM > Subject: New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt > > >> Dear CCAMPers, >> >> We have published a "new" I-D: >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt >> >> This I-D replaces the previous I-D >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-01.txt. >> >> According to the discussion in Prague meeting, we have: >> 1) Changed draft to be Informational. Mainly rewords the draft to make >> sure that it does not give instructions that could be interpreted as >> defining the procedures. >> 2) The title of the I-D has been changed to "Description of the RSVP-TE >> Graceful Restart Procedures", in order to wide the scope of this I-D to >> include the single node graceful restart scenario. >> >> Best regards, >> Dan Li > > >
- New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt Dan Li
- Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt … Adrian Farrel
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Lucy Yong
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Young Lee
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Greg Bernstein
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Mach Chen
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Diego Caviglia (GA/ERI)
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Bardalai, Snigdho
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… fabien.verhaeghe
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Zhang Renhai
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Dan Li
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Arun Satyanarayana
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel