RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?

["Diego Caviglia (GA/ERI)" <[e-mail]>]

Me too I support this ID.

BR

Diego

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mach Chen
Sent: mercoledì 27 giugno 2007 3.03
To: Adrian Farrel; Dan Li; ccamp
Cc: Deborah A. Brungard; Arun Satyanarayana
Subject: Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?

Yes,  Support this I-D to be a WG document.

Best regards,
Mach

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>
To: "Dan Li" <[e-mail]>; "ccamp" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <[e-mail]>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:40 PM
Subject: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?


> Hi,
> 
> In Prague we found that there was some support for this work, and no 
> opposition.
> 
> There were questions regarding clarifying that the work does not define new 
> process or procedures, but explains how existing procedures (i.e. 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-08.txt) can be applied in a variety of 
> situations. I think that this revision has included this clarification.
> 
> There was a request to broaden the draft to cover all scenarios (not just 
> multi-node as before), and this has been done.
> 
> There was concern about whether there was "service provider" interest in 
> this work. In fact, several of the hands raised to express interest worked 
> for service providers. But I am not personally convinced that this 
> Informational work needs strong support from that sector. More to the point 
> would be support from the vendors who need to agree how they will operate 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext.
> 
> So, I'd like to ask the WG whether there is support to make this I-D a WG 
> draft.
> If we do, I would like to see it complete quite quickly. It would need:
> - review by vendors to make sure it is accurate
> - a bit more text on security issues
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dan Li" <[e-mail]>
> To: "ccamp" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <[e-mail]>; "Farrel, Adrian" 
> <[e-mail]>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:08 AM
> Subject: New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt
> 
> 
>> Dear CCAMPers,
>>
>> We have published a "new" I-D:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt
>>
>> This I-D replaces the previous I-D 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-01.txt.
>>
>> According to the discussion in Prague meeting, we have:
>> 1) Changed draft to be Informational. Mainly rewords the draft to make 
>> sure that it does not give instructions that could be interpreted as 
>> defining the procedures.
>> 2) The title of the I-D has been changed to "Description of the RSVP-TE 
>> Graceful Restart Procedures", in order to wide the scope of this I-D to 
>> include the single node graceful restart scenario.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dan Li 
> 
> 
> 
>