Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt

[Jean Philippe Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tom,

Quite frankly, Adrian has been helping out in this draft (and others) and 
his contribution has been a key element of success in trying to 
achieve/reflect the consensus of many individuals.

Thanks.

JP.

At 08:01 PM 5/13/2004 +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>A reasonable request, Tom.
>And heaven knows I have enough other stuff to do.
>
>For the record, I took this on in order to drive the work through in a 
>shape that was
>agreed by the WG. I'm more than happy to drop to the role of contributing 
>author.
>
>Tom, are you busy? What do you know about multi-area/AS? Could you be the 
>editor?
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tom Petch" <[e-mail]>
>To: "Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
>Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 8:52 PM
>Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt
>
>
> > I always have a reservation when the WG chair and the I-D editor are or
> > turn out to be the same individual.  I think that the IETF discourages this
> > for good reason and so for this to be adopted, I would like someone other
> > than the WG chair to take the role of (lead) editor.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>
> > To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> > Date: 06 May 2004 22:08
> > Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt
> >
> >
> > >Folks,
> > >
> > >This draft represents the first step in the much-discussed six point plan
> > towards
> > >inter-area/AS solutions.
> > >
> > >I would like three things to happen:
> > >
> > >a. This draft to become a WG draft
> > >    Please send your opinions
> > >b. The draft to be reinforced in areas that people consider necessary
> > >    One such area MAY be diverse routing.
> > >    Please send suggested text, but
> > >    - recall that this is not a solutions draft
> > >    - try to keep the length of the draft down below 100 pages
> > >c. Move on with the next step in the plan.
> > >    At the moment, this seems to require effort on points 2 and 4
> > >    Viz, develop individual signaling solutions as required and
> > >    state their applicability.
> > >    We await input from those who have preferred solutions.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >Adrian
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: <[e-mail]>
> > >To: <[e-mail]>
> > >Cc: <[e-mail]>
> > >Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:44 PM
> > >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt
> > >
> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > >>
> > >> Title : A Framework for Inter-Domain MPLS Traffic Engineering
> > >> Author(s) : A. Farrel, et al.
> > >> Filename : draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt
> > >> Pages : 14
> > >> Date : 2004-4-30
> > >>
> > >> This document provides a framework for establishing and controlling
> > >>    Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS)
> > >>    Label Switched Paths (LSPs) in multi-domain networks.
> > >>
> > >>    For the purposes of this document, a domain is considered to be any
> > >>    collection of network elements within a common sphere of address
> > >>    management or path computational responsibility. Examples of such
> > >>    domains include IGP areas and Autonomous Systems.
> > >>
> > >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > >>
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framewo
> > rk-00.txt
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >