Re: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D

Dirk Schroetter <dschroet@cisco.com> Wed, 06 August 2008 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3AE28C0FC for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gchSXGmRE5yt for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E523A6BD5 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KQkGo-0004Yy-0F for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:45:46 +0000
Received: from [144.254.224.140] (helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dschroet@cisco.com>) id 1KQkGj-0004Xz-QR for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:45:44 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,315,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="16405767"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2008 14:45:38 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m76EjcbN015555; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:45:38 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m76Ejcl9002803; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:45:38 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com ([144.254.231.72]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:45:38 +0200
Received: from [10.55.224.245] ([10.55.224.245]) by xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:45:37 +0200
From: Dirk Schroetter <dschroet@cisco.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
X-Priority: 3
References: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Message-Id: <347BCAC2-A789-4329-814C-C34A54DCFD49@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:45:36 +0200
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2008 14:45:37.0740 (UTC) FILETIME=[1713E8C0:01C8F7D3]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=701; t=1218033938; x=1218897938; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dschroet@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dirk=20Schroetter=20<dschroet@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Poll=20for=20RWA=20Info=20model=20as=20 WG=20I-D |Sender:=20; bh=TFtYPAqTcfNW7yWooQymkvssOFPwIm+G8FuZFC3ZDYA=; b=KVIgekcMKhCjImTY8k8vwYgYfDBrW/dg/0NMf2qXHNL9pRWdKCSWCM+XYF fngEv9lSLbeGo1uVqcidQPpLv7IXASB7DOMSDtiFgqdtUh1qtyL5ARfpgF+Q fwbEH+VmyS;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=dschroet@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

I am in favor of this document being adopted as a working group I-D.

Best Regards,

/Dirk

Am 05.08.2008 um 18:24 schrieb Adrian Farrel:

> Hi,
>
> draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-info-03.txt was discussed in Dublin and  
> seemed to be pretty mature.
>
> Note that despite the file name, the content of this document is  
> consistent with its title: "Routing and Wavelength Assignment  
> Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks." That  
> is, the scope is limited to the information model for RWA.
>
> Can we have your opinion, please, on whether this document is ready  
> to be adopted as a working group I-D.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Deborah
>
>
>
>
>