RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D

"Itaru Nishioka" <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com> Thu, 07 August 2008 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7DF3A6BC6 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.54
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.855, BAYES_05=-1.11, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGAPdw7g9FUZ for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9B93A6B0B for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KQtUX-000M4d-Uz for ccamp-data@psg.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:36:33 +0000
Received: from [202.32.8.193] (helo=tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>) id 1KQtUU-000M4I-EF for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:36:32 +0000
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53E.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.161]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m770aPOY010541; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:36:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id m770aPg24485; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:36:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from togyo.jp.nec.com (togyo.jp.nec.com [10.26.220.4]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m770aPuD005182; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:36:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from C08AUG00201 ([10.56.131.165] [10.56.131.165]) by mail.jp.nec.com with ESMTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:36:25 +0900
Reply-To: <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
From: "Itaru Nishioka" <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
To: "'Adrian Farrel'" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
References: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
In-Reply-To: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:36:24 +0900
Organization: nec
Message-Id: <09ECBCBC089143AE8B596DDA8919317C@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acj3GM4nPLSe0Jw1Ti6CKwthFX9ZOwBDJj7g
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

Yes, good.

Itaru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:24 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
> 
> Hi,
> 
> draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-info-03.txt was discussed in 
> Dublin and seemed to be pretty mature.
> 
> Note that despite the file name, the content of this document 
> is consistent with its title: "Routing and Wavelength 
> Assignment Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical 
> Networks." That is, the scope is limited to the information 
> model for RWA.
> 
> Can we have your opinion, please, on whether this document is 
> ready to be adopted as a working group I-D.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Deborah
> 
> 
> 
> 
>