Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

"Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <> Thu, 31 July 2014 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510661A036F for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8Am-NL4Pxoj for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B561A0377 for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1373; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406790145; x=1407999745; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=xpqZJ1VoFArQ+DQ1h3pU9tL1Z+8nHgmVhJowXhlAdlM=; b=DDAFTmII8vTzWJmgYZ+pqqUcrRmWSm1Dd0OCxlKM7LQ3x0LF953GBNGn 0inyEvzJ5oQNQQ7+wARpCGX2d9fArRzugkFOdfSTLdWFA/sfqpv1E/VXf 7Sy/ujeXqiLv/dYu0SrcVhqfciuiU6KWyKreXPRTy+Ndk4/DLvxb9bb7w M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,770,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="344070802"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2014 07:02:24 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6V72N0M017057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:02:23 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:02:23 -0500
From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <>
Thread-Topic: IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Thread-Index: Ac+rXdFAjNn+1/4gRVGf5hQhUm4haQBWXquA
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:02:23 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:02:26 -0000

Hi Matt,

a couple of initial answers ...

On 29 Jul 2014, at 21:06, Matt Hartley (mhartley) <> wrote:

> Authors,
> A couple of things on the IANA section in this doc. I'm not actually sure what the right thing to do is in either case - perhaps the Chairs could offer guidance if need be?
> First: in the new "Values for Wavelength Assignment Method field in WavelengthSelection Sub-TLV" registry, would it be worth specifying a small range of values for Experimental Use (or any of the other categories, for that matter)? Note that I don't have any proposal for what might be done with these; I'm just thinking that they may come in useful in the future.

GM> Very good comment. Btw, during ietf Young and me we were editing to prepare next version 9, our working copy has room for some experimental code points. 

> Second: the new Path-error subcodes in this doc have been assigned values already (not even marked as "suggested". Have you got early allocation of these? Or should they become TBD until IANA formally assigns them? Just wondering, since we're going through the same stuff with the SRLG-collection draft…

GM> Agree 

Much thx for your comments, let Young and/or chairs to complete with additional info.


> Cheers
> Matt