Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 11 October 2012 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9721F0C3A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3RQklUU-67r for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy7.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD87711E80EA for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28300 invoked by uid 0); 11 Oct 2012 19:00:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2012 19:00:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=CtgDBjR7D2YGO7BlAmosvby5xD1kqZulv7pkUOLD3j8=; b=omR76apGk9wHS1WSoLgfgRaK1treBux14Zn3R1j8f+O2RX4yrClIuVd6/qMD3cWJDhv0G3O73vefQdmrelQRk4xKwVENoGsZBVpLLCpPA2jukC8yoC6mIPfc5RUcVDco;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:44597 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TMNzn-00039B-Mp; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:00:35 -0600
Message-ID: <5077174E.8000407@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:00:30 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Elisa Bellagamba <elisa.bellagamba@ericsson.com>
References: <20121007182354.19033.17145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5072FEC1.7020108@labn.net> <59AB558A089035438998A3EE6321ACBEAF72@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <59AB558A089035438998A3EE6321ACBEAF72@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:00:52 -0000

WG,
	Please review and comment on changes.  See
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-10.txt

Recall that this document is post WG LC.

Elisa,
	Thank you for the update.  Some comments.
- Please review IDNITs and ensure that the document is clean, see
http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-10.txt

- Missing metrics:  line 684 (using lines numbers from nits URL),

- Threshold definition, lines 687/8:   I really don't think these
definitions are adequate to ensure consistent implementation. How about:
 Loss Threshold: indicates the MaxLMIntervalLoss threshold (measured in
 packets) as defined in [RFC6374].

- Line 742-4, Delay Threshold: is this one way or two way delay?  I
don't see how you can specify a default.

- line 784, Refresh Timer.  This should have a reference and perhaps
just say "MUST carry the same value used in the Refresh Timer field
defined in [rfc6427]."

You might want to discuss your proposed changes on the list and get
agreement before rev'ing the document again.  Of course, rev numbers are
cheap too...

Lou

On 10/11/2012 11:46 AM, Elisa Bellagamba wrote:
> 
> Hi Lou,
> 
> we have just uploaded version 10 which is inserting back the refresh timer field in accordance with RFC 6427 and fixing the TBD values to the ones recommended in RFC 6375.
> 
> Thanks,
> Elisa 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: den 8 oktober 2012 18:27
> To: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
> 
> Authors,
> 	I see you still have some default values called out as TBD.
> Can you please send your proposed defaults to the WG so that we can ensure consensus on these? (Obviously, these need to be filled in before any publication request.)
> 
> Also, I see you removed the units from the Refresh Timer field.  Was this intentional?  I think some unit of measure is needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lou
> 
> On 10/7/2012 2:23 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> 	Title           : Configuration of Pro-Active Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-based Transport Networks using RSVP-TE
>> 	Author(s)       : Elisa Bellagamba
>>                           Loa Andersson
>>                           Pontus Skoldstrom
>>                           Dave Ward
>>                           Attila Takacs
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
>> 	Pages           : 22
>> 	Date            : 2012-10-07
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This specification describes the configuration of pro-active MPLS-TP
>>    Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for a
>>    given LSP using a set of TLVs that are carried by the RSVP-TE
>>    protocol.
>>
>>    This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
>>    (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication
>>    Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
>>    Profile within the IETF MPLS and PWE3 architectures to support the
>>    capabilities and functionalities of a packet transport network.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-
>> ext
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-
>> ext-09
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>