Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements

CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> Thu, 09 March 2017 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817981297D6 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:54:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGz4fI9XKJw2 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from authsmtp.register.it (authsmtp20.register.it [81.88.48.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D19E1297EA for <ccg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:54:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([87.67.243.98]) by paganini32 with id tuu61u00D285haF01uu6Jb; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:54:07 +0100
X-Rid: cw@christopherwilkinson.eu@87.67.243.98
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5175ACF8-2C4F-4B1D-B1EE-AA6BBC104C91"
From: CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:54:05 +0100
Message-Id: <9225ADA7-01F4-4830-8527-C2B8199ABC2A@christopherwilkinson.eu>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/4Yzatboi40riaay-7qwoZjpSMFg>
Cc: Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, ccg@ietf.org, GREG SHATAN <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:54:14 -0000

Dear Tobias Gordon:

Thankyou. I shall also review the document and respond in good time for your schedule.
I would like to clarify how exactly the envisaged Community Reviews would be conducted.

May I suggest that those of us who are in Copenhagen next week might  meet briefly and informally to establish personal contact.

Best regards

Christopher Wilkinson

On 01 Mar 2017, at 16:39, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>; wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
>  
> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License
> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements.  Exhibit E
> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the
> Trust and ICANN.
>  
> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details
> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out
> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance
> by the CCG.
>  
> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact
> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to
> change the Technical Contact.
>  
> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can
> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the
> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that
> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and
> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period
> of no less than ten business days.
>  
> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit
> deletions.
>  
> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those
> proposed details.
>  
> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes.
>  
> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each
> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which
> was done.
>  
> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the
> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities
> accept these changes.
>  
> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the
> next steps to be:
>  
>   a.  Community Review
>   b.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements
>   c.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
>             (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements)
>   d.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review 
>   e.  Community Review
>   f.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>   g.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements 
>   h.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
>  
> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the
> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Tobias Gondrom
> Chair
> IETF Trust
>  
> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list
> CCG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg