Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> Mon, 27 March 2017 11:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9FA129501 for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcwU4Ul6uQXB for <ccg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authsmtp.register.it (authsmtp12.register.it [81.88.48.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F97129672 for <ccg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] ([91.181.159.234]) by paganini32 with id 0zyp1v00l53jmSb01zyqEQ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:58:55 +0200
X-Rid: cw@christopherwilkinson.eu@91.181.159.234
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1842DD3-6672-48D3-97F1-89C00132FA54"
From: CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <9225ADA7-01F4-4830-8527-C2B8199ABC2A@christopherwilkinson.eu>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:58:46 +0200
Cc: ccg@ietf.org, Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, GREG SHATAN <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <8376487D-815C-4419-9080-66F5B101B153@christopherwilkinson.eu>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org> <9225ADA7-01F4-4830-8527-C2B8199ABC2A@christopherwilkinson.eu>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/I1dcOMrHm2qCILVh7ABv9RhfT2w>
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:59:03 -0000
Good afternoon: On this occasion I can confirm my agreement to the amendments to and the current text of Exhibit E, as proposed below. More generally, however, and for future reference, I would like CCG to be associated more thoroughly with any issues or texts that arise in this context. For instance, I have no record of CCG having been associated with the development of the final IANA IPR Licence Agreement, whereas I had pointed out some time ago that in the international context it would not be appropriate to grant a monopoly to the AAA Rules in the event of unresolved disputes. But this appears to have been ignored. Regards Christopher Wilkinson PS: I was disappointed that there was no opportunity to meet during ICANN58 in Copenhagen. On 09 Mar 2017, at 19:54, CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote: > Dear Tobias Gordon: > > Thankyou. I shall also review the document and respond in good time for your schedule. > I would like to clarify how exactly the envisaged Community Reviews would be conducted. > > May I suggest that those of us who are in Copenhagen next week might meet briefly and informally to establish personal contact. > > Best regards > > Christopher Wilkinson > > On 01 Mar 2017, at 16:39, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust >> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar. >> >> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License >> Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements. Exhibit E >> is the same in each of the three license agreements between the >> Trust and ICANN. >> >> The implementation of the requirements needed additional details >> than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out >> with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance >> by the CCG. >> >> Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and >> Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact >> the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to >> change the Technical Contact. >> >> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can >> override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the >> Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that >> notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and >> Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period >> of no less than ten business days. >> >> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where >> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit >> deletions. >> >> A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those >> proposed details. >> >> CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes. >> >> Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each >> Operational Community accepts the “Initial License Agreement”, which >> was done. >> >> The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the >> License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities >> accept these changes. >> >> Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the >> next steps to be: >> >> a. Community Review >> b. Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements >> c. Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A >> (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements) >> d. Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review >> e. Community Review >> f. Trust executes CSC Agreement >> g. CSC Test of conformance to the requirements >> h. All IANA domains transferred upon successful test >> >> Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the >> License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tobias Gondrom >> Chair >> IETF Trust >> >> <Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements Markup -00.pdf>_______________________________________________ >> CCG mailing list >> CCG@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg >
- [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Greg Shatan
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Alan Barrett
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … John Curran
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail