Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?)
Benjamin Black <b@b3k.us> Fri, 17 October 2014 23:48 UTC
Return-Path: <b@b3k.us>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02471A87B2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGV18gDO7lrM for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13DC11A87B1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a1so1859260wgh.33 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=y2QR7QVU5+RXGuDOoQA6BkVDrM862urwsUBmdI2WOn8=; b=WPRghDINX+tcqwnoDIbhqjSHv9UulA87qR2kXa1vePL4Ugh8bwXxZUPpELECOevL+b I0AH8axqzXb4GC+vDkoUUlhBzU8UiVGenHbRhjPiKxZbcEln0XhkZROHKUH1nLhSKNVO eRvQheqA83qaPYlCO2+b9HakJPwEttTghU9sUrE7LoFYMqtEu8B3ioAUy2kI4MGjFvij dAIcx6XkIUxq2j7z98Tn1Q71MgfqHql94Z5w9rZ0d8s2JI9YTAzB+YlhcHs0HbqJJ/J3 BfBs9jDiJ5ZSO39tht1LZKssN1nD7RDp6R3BRa++jVf+62b+Vy6pkLufBocmZECEf0tw pccA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlS/gBAZuvypeBfw8ddI0QFRk4VWYm6u36hLEs5IjagCqOynyZBIa0EfQWNoxHSAkk6XZ5H
X-Received: by 10.194.48.84 with SMTP id j20mr13969174wjn.35.1413589689136; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.217.14.70 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjrSVn=T4uqJsQ00Jp0H3-AL7-pk0RSJ_gyGrJgKGpuSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D065A817.30406%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <54400E9F.5020905@akr.io> <CAMm+LwhVKBfcfrXUKmVXKsiAMRSTV+ws+u07grmxkfnR2oYJoQ@mail.gmail.com> <5218FD35-E00A-413F-ACCB-AA9B99DEF48B@shiftleft.org> <CAMm+LwjrSVn=T4uqJsQ00Jp0H3-AL7-pk0RSJ_gyGrJgKGpuSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Black <b@b3k.us>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:47:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+Vbu7wFiujSZAFWa3CE=YaRJTGdO3bittnZs9-p2Uj05jK7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86c92447b0530505a6ffb4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/OIL3qZ9LXHWDT63Fqrc28fzf9y0
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:48:13 -0000
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com > wrote: > > > > >> > That depends on whether you are looking for a reason to include or >> exclude. >> > >> > At the ~512 level, what I am looking for is a curve that absolutely >> > nobody is going to be able to suggest is suspect as being bongoed. >> > 2^512 is a round number that needs no explanation. 2^521 isn’t. >> >> I’m not sure what you mean by “bongoed”. I do not believe that 2^521-1 >> has been struck rhythmically by hands, or has been played as a melody on >> bongos. >> > > Got at by the NSA. > If the NSA is capable of causing numbers to be Mersenne primes then we should all pack it in immediately. b
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Johannes Merkle
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Johannes Merkle
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Johannes Merkle
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Hallof, Andreas
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) David Leon Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Hallof, Andreas
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) David Leon Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Hardware requirements, Brainpool (was:… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot James Cloos
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Rob Stradling
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Alyssa Rowan
- [Cfrg] W3C WebCrypto WG Liasioning [was Re: ECC r… Harry Halpin
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Lochter, Manfred
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Lochter, Manfred
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Lochter, Manfred
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Johannes Merkle
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Rob Stradling
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Rob Stradling
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Samuel Neves
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot Ilari Liusvaara