Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 17 October 2014 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8411A7033 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lO5DOhbCYXLf for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D7B1A702D for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14775BE97; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:30:57 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPAf-SVVCdea; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:30:56 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.42.18.172]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC7E5BE8A; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:30:55 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <54418A8F.3090506@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:30:55 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Hamburg <mike@shiftleft.org>
References: <D065A817.30406%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <543FF1A7.8030908@secunet.com> <544002AF.1020107@akr.io> <5440DFA7.80208@secunet.com> <20141017094755.GA29915@LK-Perkele-VII> <0FC829CD89DE224E98637A5D757BC1B81F02460A@GSBEEX01.int.gematik.de> <CACsn0ckL=oSdy8Dos3ZaE505nQxz+7fTnVVjJdfdM6=H0wy+Tw@mail.gmail.com> <842BF4E0-8132-42F6-BDE6-65717E004006@shiftleft.org>
In-Reply-To: <842BF4E0-8132-42F6-BDE6-65717E004006@shiftleft.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/XmXnGx7Ae4zmF2Whxphj1IhsytU
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] ECC reboot (Was: When's the decision?)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:30:58 -0000


On 17/10/14 18:58, Michael Hamburg wrote:
> So is the thrust of this whole argument “have your special curves,
> but make Brainpool mandatory to implement”?  If so, just say so, and
> let the forum discuss it separately, and unblock the discussion of
> new curves.

If that were the case then CFRG would be the wrong forum. Which algs
are MTI for which IETF protocols is an IETF issue.

S.