IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFCS - Telnet commands mixed with 3270 data

"Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com> Tue, 15 March 1994 13:12 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01581; 15 Mar 94 8:12 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01576; 15 Mar 94 8:12 EST
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03831; 15 Mar 94 8:12 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1243; Tue, 15 Mar 94 08:10:08 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 1241; Tue, 15 Mar 94 08:07:28 EST
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 08:03:00 -0500
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com>
Subject: Re: RFCS - Telnet commands mixed with 3270 data
X-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9403150812.aa03831@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Fred said:

>I thought our agreement was that these would be prohibited.  IACs would
>only occur inside a block for IAC doubling.  Otherwise, hold off until
>after the IAC EOR, then put in your IAC whatever.

>However, I see that section 8 introduction says just the opposite!

OK.  It has been over a week since the last comments on RFCS.  Let's cut
bait or fish.

Opinions on which way we should go on IACs within a 3270 datastream will be
solicited until the end of the week.  I would like to have the last call on
IETF issued on this before the Thursday of next week when I go on vacation
for Passover (and before IETF at Seattle).

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email