Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Wed, 24 April 2013 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E58821F8BCC for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.835
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QokcgKmkK6Oh for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx09.uni-tuebingen.de (mx09.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552C421F8BD4 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from samsung7PC (u-173-c016.cs.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.173.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx09.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r3O7Pl7q003477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:25:47 +0200
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <00f801ce3ff7$354e29b0$9fea7d10$@uni-tuebingen.de> <20130423193100.GA29460@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BLU0-SMTP253460B99C4D6CE07CE75CD0B40@phx.gbl> <20130424042509.GB29460@audi.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20130424042509.GB29460@audi.shelbyville.oz>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:25:50 +0200
Message-ID: <005701ce40bc$f2ab3960$d801ac20$@uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQINifGw+LNE7ZeWezpfl6cPzn30iQILTLKdAeBqRxcBYWBp4Jg7951w
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus-Spam-Check: clean (checked by Avira MailGate: version: 3.2.1.26; spam filter version: 3.2.0/2.3; host: mx09)
X-AntiVirus: checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.2.1.26; AVE: 8.2.12.30; VDF: 7.11.74.42; host: mx09); id=22079-GfWEYG
Subject: Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:25:50 -0000

We have about 11 experiments:

* Some of those are for the (uninformed) general public (the first part, 6
experiments), 
* Some of those are the guys who want to make Opus work well on the Internet
(the second part, 5 experiments),
* Some of those are for the codec developers only (the difficult item test,
1 experiment).

As for the last one, it is a tit for tat game: "Show me where my codec is
bad and I show you where your codec is bad."  If the codec developers want
to play it, fine with me. I am happy to watch the contest. But if we do not
get input from both sides, we won't start the listening tests on this
subject as we need both teams on the playground.

Christian