Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing
Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Tue, 19 October 2010 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FDF3A68B1 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrs8QaUDWEmV for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stewe.org (stewe.org [85.214.122.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65273A6870 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (unverified [24.5.132.232]) by stewe.org (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 819265-1743317 for multiple; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:20:58 +0200
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.26.0.100708
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:20:47 -0700
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>, Pochol@WebfootGames.com, codec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C8E3055F.253CE%stewe@stewe.org>
Thread-Topic: [codec] Opus codec licensing
Thread-Index: ActvNCcg/6UdLTfYSPe62Egnu0SU9wAAN+7tABsLZFo=
In-Reply-To: <390831ED3DF58E41A3D2FB82591E2C3605A34C4D@MAILEXCH.octasic.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3370321257_9559710"
X-Originating-IP: 24.5.132.232
X-Authenticated-User: stewe@stewe.org
X-ORBS-Stamp: Your IP (24.5.132.232) was found in the spamhaus database. http://www.spamhaus.net
Subject: Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:19:38 -0000
Hi, With ³hat²: It is, in almost all cases, unwise for a third party to circumscribeor worse: abbreviatelicensing terms provided by a rightholder. Skype¹s licensing declaration can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1297. I note that the statement contains conditions beyond the acceptance of their technology into an IETF standard. Stephan On 10.18.2010 19:26 , "Jean-Marc Valin" <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> wrote: > Opus is available under the BSD license. As for patents, Skype has pledged to > make them available royalty-free once the codec is accepted as an IETF > standard. > > Jean-Marc > > -----Original Message----- > From: codec-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Pascal Pochol > Sent: Mon 10/18/2010 10:19 PM > To: codec@ietf.org > Subject: [codec] Opus codec licensing > > Hello, > > we've been using speex and celt for voice and music but today I heard about > Opus which sounds like a fantastic replacement for both these codecs. > > We're wondering if Opus will be released under the same type of license as > speex and celt? SILK's license forbid its use in commercial software and > we're worried that it might carry over to Opus. If not, as soon as Opus > handles lower bitrates, stereo and fixed point decoding we'll be using it. > > -Pascal > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec > > > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Jean-Marc Valin
- [codec] Opus codec licensing Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing James Cloos
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Benjamin M. Schwartz
- [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:Opus… Jonas Svedberg
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:… Erik Norvell
- Re: [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:… Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:… Erik Norvell
- Re: [codec] Proposed Guidelines update , was: Re:… Erik Norvell
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing Koen Vos