Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing

Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net> Wed, 27 October 2010 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B0D3A67AF for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVK5b-xug-Wh for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ecbiz71.inmotionhosting.com (ecbiz71.inmotionhosting.com [173.205.126.243]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B863A659A for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pool-98-109-139-97.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net ([98.109.139.97] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by ecbiz71.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>) id 1PBDRF-00019K-Ah for codec@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:21:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4CC897E7.7070302@jdrosen.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:21:43 -0400
From: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <d8e2717860c5397e57ad1638cc3c74dd@WebfootGames.com> <390831ED3DF58E41A3D2FB82591E2C3605A34C4D@MAILEXCH.octasic.com> <m3y69o5anm.fsf@jhcloos.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3y69o5anm.fsf@jhcloos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ecbiz71.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jdrosen.net
Subject: Re: [codec] Opus codec licensing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:19:52 -0000

The Skype IPR declaration uses standard in the lower-case sense - any 
standards track RFC. It does not mean that it only applies to a full 
standard protocol.

For those not familiar - IETF standards track documents can be in one of 
three categories - proposed standard, draft standard, and standard. A 
specification, in theory progresses through these three phases in that 
order, each with a different RFC assigned. In practice, the vast 
majority of standards-track RFCs are proposed standard, and never make 
it beyond that stage.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.

On 10/24/2010 3:09 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "JV" == Jean-Marc Valin<jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>  writes:
>
> JV>  Opus is available under the BSD license. As for patents, Skype has
> JV>  pledged to make them available royalty-free once the codec is
> JV>  accepted as an IETF standard.
>
> As a Standard?  Or just published as an standards-track RFC?
>
> That is a /huge/ difference, time-wise.
>
> -JimC

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   SkypeID: jdrosen
Chief Technology Strategist                    Mobile: +1 (732) 766-2496
Skype                                          SkypeIn: +1 (408) 465-0361
jdrosen@skype.net                              http://www.skype.com
jdrosen@jdrosen.net                            http://www.jdrosen.net