IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] are we there yet?

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Tue, 12 March 2013 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA88921F8C84 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-juYZ4OvFBu for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-f169.google.com (mail-ve0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C821E21F8AA1 for <coman@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 15so3111317vea.14 for <coman@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Bk5CgTI0vMlEzzWxqGFGptea9DAg1q5ti2o+IY21tYc=; b=Ok8822I7EH8RnJkJ8+9HwP1xAeB4FxrWDUUoKZ8U3Xl64KA4jNCmpFVO3OkgDfXeDk 7mYXhkHQ44vGAJwsHnyxindPfULlhxbr+3qQ8ka3NIyBTAbKqax0hDFPme8TAzM/s+D9 5LAvDnbqVNXNZkICbGgfa+QjWXI9lubFNVmJo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Bk5CgTI0vMlEzzWxqGFGptea9DAg1q5ti2o+IY21tYc=; b=YakIXKP3Eru6C/DBXPwSTjfwhsnS1tmowQEJLWgIknpZK1ZzlLa9G888sBteVOGWmv EcJyJOaOQyicvVmPMOdejyMpLn52ZRW2fOkr0g5g/0QTiYXkkaBA2ORa+9faxQYNsJ7W f4eMyAQLCt5rrv7wYHLathRvLobN5txvHQsD93RohLXP0SNbQE2Tm9jVVDuy4dqhIEaH aC7FaW526DHlBF5tT2XJeQJe+rImjcyji8RfZ+MxyRBLMNTUpq+1L+hFXh/zuC9RAlHB 4hfcr1N+WnevB8upYdEyoW4PXaLwrfgOq3uqIlH5Vl9oTQ+Ktg0hzFeOh1rYSvehxbCd xj6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.96.163 with SMTP id dt3mr5032940vdb.11.1363049061208; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.106.202 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F806A07F@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <22677.1363008722@sandelman.ca> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F80655D7@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <3007.1363036765@sandelman.ca> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F806A07F@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC_u+rp3NfGy3bsqCB4yTbZL0VZ+-Ar9E6GNUT1Q-G=jsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f37fa1b278d04d7af9749"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKhWcqbrByOf3+m6E6YikR+GilcqZusMJnTG08/AVMbHX7ohnj0QvttVPiy2osJ7IGQUup
Cc: "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>, ext Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:44:22 -0000

ah, sorry, just saw your reply, Mehmet.

>From my point of view, the question is not whether the topic fills a gap in
the IETF (which IMO it clearly does), but rather whether there is enough
interest and work force to pursue the task. I would like to contribute.

Best
Ulrich

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <
mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:

> Correct. See attachment.
>
> Cheers,
> Mehmet
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: coman-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:coman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext
> > Michael Richardson
> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:19 PM
> > To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> > Cc: coman@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
> >
> >
> > >>>>> "NSN" == NSN  <Ersue> writes:
> >     NSN> Forming a WG is an option. However, we have left this open and
> >     NSN> dependent on the community interest.
> >
> >     NSN> Do you think it is important and should be pushed?
> >
> >     NSN> Can folks please comment on the draft recently submitted?
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't know which draft that is.
> > I'm guessing... draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03  ??
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Richardson
> > -on the road-
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> coman mailing list
> coman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email