IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] are we there yet?

Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <likepeng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCF621F868B for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.220, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPWGP+4ZmZ93 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1956321F8688 for <coman@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQN88934; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:55:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:55:19 +0000
Received: from SZXEML452-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.195) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:55:48 +0000
Received: from SZXEML525-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.81]) by szxeml452-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.195]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:55:40 +0800
From: Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [coman] are we there yet?
Thread-Index: AQHOHlzVpc9nmJbZzUi8O+rj72E29Zif/0eAgAAJJoCAAEIigIAA8jKA//+FiACAAIdqoA==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:55:39 +0000
Message-ID: <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F21EDDDF18@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <22677.1363008722@sandelman.ca> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F80655D7@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <CAK=bVC8CuqxsPo+5ihHeJrfY6S5=jhpQz5oDf0L_qybg5r_B5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CANF4ybt0MmnQXR0ZQKSPJ8AjW-wF-hduyysmzVq9ebj2jsfsQw@mail.gmail.com> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F21EDDDD20@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20130312014021.GA64284@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20130312014021.GA64284@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.167.122]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>, "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>, ext Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:55:54 -0000

>To do what exactly?

As far as I can see, the main scope is to manage the constrained device.

Currently we have some protocols to manage mobile devices, like OMA DM. And we have SNMP to manage networks. But these protocols are too heavy to be used to manage the constrained devices. That is why I think the work is valid.

I notice that we have two drafts available already, one is about the problem statement, and use cases, the other one is the gap analysis, to identify the gaps between the requirements and the current standards.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-greevenbosch-coman-candidate-tech/

We have a good start point, and can continue to work towards the intended scope.

Kind Regards
Kepeng

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
发送时间: 2013年3月12日 9:40
收件人: Likepeng
抄送: James Nguyen; Ulrich Herberg; Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); coman@ietf.org; ext Michael Richardson
主题: Re: [coman] are we there yet?

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:00:19AM +0000, Likepeng wrote:
> +1.
> I think the work is valuable in IETF.
> We should try to push it and form a WG.

To do what exactly?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email