IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] are we there yet?

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Mon, 11 March 2013 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371CE11E80CC for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VoI3d19Nqk+s for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B075521F90D0 for <coman@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r2BMrYQU016959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:53:34 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r2BMrYrO022628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:53:34 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.216]) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:53:34 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: ext Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Thread-Topic: [coman] are we there yet?
Thread-Index: AQHOHlzUQq1aaE2MQ02p71ZdhReX95iggd5ggABs24CAACrX4A==
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:53:33 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F806A07F@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <22677.1363008722@sandelman.ca> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F80655D7@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <3007.1363036765@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3007.1363036765@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.118]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F806A07FDEMUMBX005nsnintr_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 8003
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1363042414-000050C9-F73BC654/0-0/0-0
Cc: "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:53:39 -0000

Correct. See attachment.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: coman-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:coman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext
> Michael Richardson
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:19 PM
> To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: coman@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
> 
> 
> >>>>> "NSN" == NSN  <Ersue> writes:
>     NSN> Forming a WG is an option. However, we have left this open and
>     NSN> dependent on the community interest.
> 
>     NSN> Do you think it is important and should be pushed?
> 
>     NSN> Can folks please comment on the draft recently submitted?
> 
> I'm afraid I don't know which draft that is.
> I'm guessing... draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03  ??
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson
> -on the road-
>
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi All,

based on the agreement in the OPS-DIR meeting in IETF 83 and the support of the O&M AD Benoit Claise we set up the Coman (COnstrained MANanagement) activity and the corresponding maillist on May 16, 2012.

Since then quite a number of people worked on the document on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements" with their text contributions and comments. Many thanks to all who helped getting it to the current stage.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03

With this email we would like to start a review of the draft above.
Please provide your comments to any of the maillists on the Too-list (please CC Coman maillist).
We hope on a useful discussion concerning the problem statement, use cases and requirements.

As the next step, we decided during IETF 85 to provide a new draft with a gap analysis on missing standards at the IETF for the purpose of Constrained Device&Network Management with the goal to highlight new work at IETF. This draft will be written just after getting the above document more stable based on your comments.

Thank you in advance.

Cheers,
Mehmet

Coman maillist info:
List address: coman@ietf.org
Archive:   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/
To subscribe:  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman




_______________________________________________
coman mailing list
coman@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman
--- End Message ---

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email