Re: [coman] are we there yet?

I am not sure I get the point.

Is it the proposal that we should use OMA LwM2M for the purpose of Coman, or is it meant that more than what OMA LwM2M specifies is not needed?

Ideally, we need to support all management dimensions on the one side: the management protocol, the information model and the necessary data models, and an appropriate modeling language.
On the other hand different management tasks need to be addressed, e.g. fault, performance and security management and not only configuration.

I think we need also understand that in the Coman draft, M2M is just one use case between many.

It would be indeed useful to elaborate, how far OMA LwM2M supports the network management requirements listed in the Coman draft, which cover both management of constrained devices and the management of networks with diverse topologies containing constrained and non-constrained devices.

Mehmet

Am 12.03.2013 um 14:52 schrieb "ext Zach Shelby" <zach@sensinode.com>:

> On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> "Zach" == Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com> writes:
>> Zach> We are just completing a new OMA Lightweight M2M standard
>> Zach> which includes an efficient Object system for managing
>> Zach> constrained devices over CoAP. It has a highly optimised form
>> Zach> of Object format which is applicable for device management,
>> Zach> network management and also application data. If you are
>> Zach> interested, I will present more information about this new
>> Zach> standard at the CoRE meeting on Wednesday.  
>> 
>> Awesome!!!!
>> 
>> is that:
>>             CoRE Resource Directory
>>     draft-shelby-core-resource-directory-05
> 
> Lightweight M2M (LWM2M) is a system standard in the Open Mobile Alliance. It includes DTLS, CoAP, Block, Observe, SenML and Resource Directory and weaves them into a device-server interface along with an Object structure. It uses a subset of the Resource Directory functionality, so the Resource Directory spec in CoRE is a more general solution.
> 
> In the Wed CoRE meeting I will be presenting a few slides on this (starts at page 113 of http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/slides/slides-86-core-1.pdf). You can also access the entire specification at:
> 
> http://member.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/DM/LightweightM2M/Permanent_documents/OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0_0-20130301-D.zip  
> 
> Regards,
> Zach
> 
> -- 
> Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd.
> http://www.sensinode.com @SensinodeIoT
> Mobile: +358 40 7796297
> Twitter: @zach_shelby
> LinkedIn: http://fi.linkedin.com/in/zachshelby
> 6LoWPAN Book: http://6lowpan.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> coman mailing list
> coman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman