Re: [coman] are we there yet?
Bert Greevenbosch <Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCF011E829D for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehsvpgN3Ynsj for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C61D11E82A9 for <coman@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id APJ26201; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:19:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:48 +0000
Received: from SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.197) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:19:26 +0000
Received: from szxeml558-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.6]) by SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.197]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:18:23 +0800
From: Bert Greevenbosch <Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [coman] are we there yet?
Thread-Index: AQHOHsghgJAKc/0uzU6bYW+bMwRYX5ihtk8AgAArbQCAAAFVAIADa9Cd
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:23 +0000
Message-ID: <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63D5AA631@szxeml558-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <22677.1363008722@sandelman.ca> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F80655D7@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <CAK=bVC8CuqxsPo+5ihHeJrfY6S5=jhpQz5oDf0L_qybg5r_B5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CANF4ybt0MmnQXR0ZQKSPJ8AjW-wF-hduyysmzVq9ebj2jsfsQw@mail.gmail.com> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F21EDDDD20@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20130312014021.GA64284@elstar.local> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F21EDDDF18@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> <BBD6E278-49FC-42FB-A342-E40086B6B364@sensinode.com> <8254.1363105006@sandelman.ca> <DA0F7870-F728-4E4C-8A70-F681FE2CF408@sensinode.com>, <20130312185658.GA70185@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20130312185658.GA70185@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.148.224]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:19:32 -0000
Hi Juergen, all, The following draft gives a high-level overview of technologies related to the coman requirements: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-greevenbosch-coman-candidate-tech/ The draft aims at indentifying technologies and gaps. There is a section about OMA LwM2M. Best regards, Bert ________________________________________ From: coman-bounces@ietf.org [coman-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder [j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] Sent: 13 March 2013 02:56 To: Zach Shelby Cc: coman@ietf.org; Michael Richardson Subject: Re: [coman] are we there yet? On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:52:12PM -0400, Zach Shelby wrote: > On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > >>>>>> "Zach" == Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com> writes: > > Zach> We are just completing a new OMA Lightweight M2M standard > > Zach> which includes an efficient Object system for managing > > Zach> constrained devices over CoAP. It has a highly optimised form > > Zach> of Object format which is applicable for device management, > > Zach> network management and also application data. If you are > > Zach> interested, I will present more information about this new > > Zach> standard at the CoRE meeting on Wednesday. > > > > Awesome!!!! > > > > is that: > > CoRE Resource Directory > > draft-shelby-core-resource-directory-05 > > Lightweight M2M (LWM2M) is a system standard in the Open Mobile Alliance. It includes DTLS, CoAP, Block, Observe, SenML and Resource Directory and weaves them into a device-server interface along with an Object structure. It uses a subset of the Resource Directory functionality, so the Resource Directory spec in CoRE is a more general solution. > > In the Wed CoRE meeting I will be presenting a few slides on this (starts at page 113 of http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/slides/slides-86-core-1.pdf). You can also access the entire specification at: > > http://member.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/DM/LightweightM2M/Permanent_documents/OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0_0-20130301-D.zip > Since you seem to know this well, any chance to get information how this new OMA collection of protocols addresses the requirements written down in the coman document? I think this would be useful input for this list to have. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ coman mailing list coman@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman
- [coman] are we there yet? Michael Richardson
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? peter van der Stok
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? dominique.barthel
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Benoit Claise
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? James Nguyen
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Michael Richardson
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Likepeng
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Likepeng
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Zach Shelby
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Likepeng
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Michael Richardson
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Michael Richardson
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Zach Shelby
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Zach Shelby
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Michael Richardson
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Bert Greevenbosch
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [coman] are we there yet? Juergen Schoenwaelder