Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid

[Ivaylo Petrov <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I am working on a new version of the SID draft that would address the
comments related to 63bit SIDs and looking to clarify how are .sid files
passed to IANA. Those are the only comments that I have received and I
believe they are not blocking the WGLC. What I heard during the last IETF
was that this draft is WGLC material, https://youtu.be/YIHoiHhz2Ys?t=1280
and I was expecting the CoRE chairs to go ahead with this. If you believe
there is some misunderstanding on my side and there are other issues that
need to be resolved before the WGLC, please let me know.

Best regards,
Ivaylo

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).

It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third
party, without the written consent of the sender.

If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately by email and delete the message and any file attached to it.
Thank you!


On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:08 AM Peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> I have not seen any progress on:
>   1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor/
>   2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/
>
> At IETF105, it seemed that the documents were unstuck, and would progress
> to WGLC soon.  Is there something holding this up other than author time?
>
>
>
> I also want to express my concern about the VERY slow progress of these
> documents.
> It is quite possible and understandable that the authors are occupied with
> too many other tasks.
>
> An additional author may be the answer to unstick the progress.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Peter
>
>