Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 08 January 2020 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05639120854 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 03:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86xFuWefCu1f for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 03:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5354B12083D for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 03:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0236.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0236.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47t5rp2P43z16JC; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:00:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFkdRwRMFx00KFXo-gJsqgAVmRfV=mKNwur1Th73uy_qj-WjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:00:56 +0100
Cc: peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, core <core@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0445EBA6-CB2E-4331-AE23-3E54D0923552@tzi.org>
References: <29380.1565102380@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50428065032ECC2AB3345F619AD70@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <7505.1565633977@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50424C618A704460E4A8F8D99AA90@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <18990.1577231446@localhost> <0bfb0f10f1a5001a588047a79d6db792@bbhmail.nl> <CAJFkdRwRMFx00KFXo-gJsqgAVmRfV=mKNwur1Th73uy_qj-WjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/xjbWEC8NgmxZYnw1ihpbRriPyAk>
Subject: Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 11:01:06 -0000

Hi Ivaylo,

The minutes indeed say:

* draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-11, draft-ietf-core-yang-library-00,
  draft-ietf-core-comi-08, draft-ietf-core-sid-07: Now ready for WGLC,
  to be sent to CoRE as well as netconf/netmod (with the discussion to
  happen on CoRE).  (One comment on the numeric range of SIDs still to
  be taken care of.)

The parenthesis may have been a bit cryptic, but the intention was indeed to have I-D versions with all known issues (including the 63-bit one) addressed.  Is there a reason this will need more time?

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2020-01-08, at 11:23, Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am working on a new version of the SID draft that would address the comments related to 63bit SIDs and looking to clarify how are .sid files passed to IANA. Those are the only comments that I have received and I believe they are not blocking the WGLC. What I heard during the last IETF was that this draft is WGLC material, https://youtu.be/YIHoiHhz2Ys?t=1280 and I was expecting the CoRE chairs to go ahead with this. If you believe there is some misunderstanding on my side and there are other issues that need to be resolved before the WGLC, please let me know.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ivaylo
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
> It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without the written consent of the sender.
> If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attached to it. Thank you!
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:08 AM Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> I have not seen any progress on:
>>   1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor/
>>   2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/
>> 
>> At IETF105, it seemed that the documents were unstuck, and would progress
>> to WGLC soon.  Is there something holding this up other than author time?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I also want to express my concern about the VERY slow progress of these documents.
>> It is quite possible and understandable that the authors are occupied with too many other tasks.
>> 
>> An additional author may be the answer to unstick the progress.
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core