IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid

Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Mon, 30 December 2019 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29157120142 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbhmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8QxVqLaqiqj for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0171.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29026120133 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3F8181D3043; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:08:08 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbhmail.nl; h= mime-version:content-type:date:from:to:cc:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:message-id; s=key; bh=UDhynS5sfh9P8vk4h8 603mQqGP0tcHU2JUnwJhwCeYY=; b=nalxf//KxFaxMGwSdyyhrBjeJQ3gQta+7R eYzTfijNN3gosdG7AOJHgirl5/RQzmESKo6vcf8xdx6TT/HwQ5aNAuciw6m/R0RY Avxkw8XpKHKe/CQQ80w3V1+ygLB+9psk4svCFM7BCspRJ3IAr37AIl/H+nTwXheG JmjfAXHjE=
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Spam-Summary: 50, 0, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, stokcons@bbhmail.nl, :::::::::::, RULES_HIT:41:72:152:355:379:582:599:962:967:973:983:988:989:1152:1189:1208:1212:1221:1260:1313:1314:1345:1359:1431:1436:1437:1516:1517:1518:1534:1541:1568:1575:1588:1589:1592:1594:1711:1714:1730:1777:1792:2068:2069:2198:2199:2525:2553:2566:2682:2685:2734:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:5007:6117:6261:6657:6659:7464:7903:8603:9025:10004:10215:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12109:12895:13139:14093:14096:14181:14721:21080:21324:21433:21451:21627:30006:30054:30090, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LFtime:1, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: crush35_46fcd8a3d7e0b
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3545
Received: from mail.bbhmail.nl (imap-ext [216.40.42.5]) (Authenticated sender: webmail@stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_7c378f41ad32c38e5eeed344515c978c"
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:08:07 +0100
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: core@ietf.org, Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliant.com>, a@ackl.io, ivaylo@ackl.io, consultancy <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <18990.1577231446@localhost>
References: <29380.1565102380@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50428065032ECC2AB3345F619AD70@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <7505.1565633977@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50424C618A704460E4A8F8D99AA90@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <18990.1577231446@localhost>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-rc2
Message-ID: <0bfb0f10f1a5001a588047a79d6db792@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
X-Originating-IP: [83.201.120.57]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/3xuJL2W5ggnpQcBP4d2zb772y3Y>
Subject: Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:08:12 -0000

> I have not seen any progress on:
> 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor/
> 2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/
> 
> At IETF105, it seemed that the documents were unstuck, and would progress
> to WGLC soon.  Is there something holding this up other than author time?
> 
> I also want to express my concern about the VERY slow progress of these documents.
> It is quite possible and understandable that the authors are occupied with too many other tasks.
> 
> An additional author may be the answer to unstick the progress.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email