Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid

Hello Carsten,

I was not aware that this is the blocking point and that is why I had put
much less priority to this modification. I should have read more carefully
the minutes, my bad. I have uploaded a new version now that addresses
this issue.

Best regards,
Ivaylo

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:00 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> Hi Ivaylo,
>
> The minutes indeed say:
>
> * draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-11, draft-ietf-core-yang-library-00,
>   draft-ietf-core-comi-08, draft-ietf-core-sid-07: Now ready for WGLC,
>   to be sent to CoRE as well as netconf/netmod (with the discussion to
>   happen on CoRE).  (One comment on the numeric range of SIDs still to
>   be taken care of.)
>
> The parenthesis may have been a bit cryptic, but the intention was indeed
> to have I-D versions with all known issues (including the 63-bit one)
> addressed.  Is there a reason this will need more time?
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>
> > On 2020-01-08, at 11:23, Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on a new version of the SID draft that would address the
> comments related to 63bit SIDs and looking to clarify how are .sid files
> passed to IANA. Those are the only comments that I have received and I
> believe they are not blocking the WGLC. What I heard during the last IETF
> was that this draft is WGLC material, https://youtu.be/YIHoiHhz2Ys?t=1280
> and I was expecting the CoRE chairs to go ahead with this. If you believe
> there is some misunderstanding on my side and there are other issues that
> need to be resolved before the WGLC, please let me know.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ivaylo
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
> > It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any
> third party, without the written consent of the sender.
> > If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender
> immediately by email and delete the message and any file attached to it.
> Thank you!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:08 AM Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have not seen any progress on:
> >>   1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor/
> >>   2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/
> >>
> >> At IETF105, it seemed that the documents were unstuck, and would
> progress
> >> to WGLC soon.  Is there something holding this up other than author
> time?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I also want to express my concern about the VERY slow progress of these
> documents.
> >> It is quite possible and understandable that the authors are occupied
> with too many other tasks.
> >>
> >> An additional author may be the answer to unstick the progress.
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > core mailing list
> > core@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>
>