Re: [core] 🔔 WG Last Call of draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-03.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 12 June 2019 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF393120121 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kOTlxC33aqr for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDEF12011A for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.113] (p54A6CA4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.202.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45P6g05RGYz104y; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E80442D-9EBF-4973-89E1-7B4A69F42754@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:10:20 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 582037818.524159-143167973b72c27ce23a4c2542ace186
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8AD8AB7-DF40-4049-901E-18C0655A3DAD@tzi.org>
References: <9AD3C4BB-7965-4776-84C4-6B5BFDCAA262@tzi.org> <e3a61d2c-1183-5ece-74d8-b1bad26ddfe6@ericsson.com> <3E80442D-9EBF-4973-89E1-7B4A69F42754@tzi.org>
To: core <core@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/TAGJXuVMzbRSUMLV1mY3ORw65Jc>
Subject: Re: [core] =?utf-8?q?=F0=9F=94=94_WG_Last_Call_of_draft-ietf-core-se?= =?utf-8?q?nml-etch-03=2Etxt?=
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:10:25 -0000

It seems we have received no (zero, nada) responses to this.
We do need a few voices from people who have read it.  
Please speak up if you did!

It’s a short document, so you can read it right now as well:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-03

Grüße, Carsten




> On Mar 11, 2019, at 23:40, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 00:40, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> If there are no further comments on these, I could merge the PR and 
>> submit a new version.
> 
> … which the authors did (see below).
> 
> This starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-03.txt,
> ending on
> 
> 	24:00 CET on Monday, March 25, 2019.
> 
> Please start a new email thread for each major issue that will need
> discussion and make sure the subject line includes the draft name and
> some sort of name for the issue.  (Minor issues such as typos can also
> be sent to the authors.)
> 
> If you read the draft and think it looks fine, please send a one line 
> email to the list or to the chairs letting us know that so we can get 
> a feel of how broad the review has been.
> 
> (To reviewers and authors:)  If you are aware of any patent claims that
> might apply to systems that implement these drafts, please review BCP 78
> and BCP 79 and make any appropriate IPR declaration before the last-call
> ends. If you are not sure whether you need to make a declaration or not, 
> please talk to the chairs and we will help.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Ari
>> 
>> On 20/02/2019 17.00, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> In preparation for the impending working-group last call, I have
>>> reviewed draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-02.txt.  Substantive comments are
>>> below; a set of small editorial comments is going to the authors in
>>> parallel.
>>> 
>>> # Minor
>>> 
>>> 1. The text of the draft does not contain an argument that the
>>>   application of Patch Packs is idempotent.  It probably should.
>>> 
>>> 2. The text sometimes says "iPATCH" where it probably should be saying
>>>   "PATCH and iPATCH".  This should be checked throughout.
>>> 
>>> 3. The term "resource" is sometimes used in lieu of "subset of SenML
>>>   records that, when resolved, match a given name".
>>> 
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> core mailing list
>>> core@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>