IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Second WGLC draft-ietf-dane-smime

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D34129599 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i_ff13TAt75n for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29906129581 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j65so32709946iof.0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2tZbZAu26gf1kFwsfXS9EuaUbuu/HS0FTciyiAyljuA=; b=nbqF+larVEUkjHfLFBSUqznk3tFxr2NQouP7oVn7O96pfRIODxpTX7pHWY4ZKiMwPY L7YN3w2PsRAPnpVf/GPUpbyepVEC/67XIoLrgM4t0BNUHCFkIKSADceeNtwG+wRoe9sx undYkInuEW0tKjtweNfwYzvg27Ky4P31L9UtV5f3SSDWfTJ4LeUTcqfGxoYE6TBOCGIz C1nmE+NXaadGsaNI/B5czIBFec/JJydEBWv0okTFBnkxmmGvUlGe93BSlKbS/13Z02eT ikGDylYSLzDVFUXjcRRoZo06uf1UWch4oinKN5hhE1G1q2t2k62vPlP+Z1Iu7nq8GDGd hZLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2tZbZAu26gf1kFwsfXS9EuaUbuu/HS0FTciyiAyljuA=; b=l6h+U4nruP30pZHffk6Rdou/+Qt2n1bcIOvTctFuPXH5Zzseww+X2+MAo2U7zKnxLM t10KMtx+ZM2euc6Zl+038hZkd53vj4YL81gR2E6uDKCB6FIEFmDs3rfGu7oF0XrHRX0t Xdcn7lA6v9Aea9PmYE/TcJtiy4ljpacEB9Q+rVKFca1HadhEq5KZ/Fbnr/438BY252lV LmEPTfLcRFZ1DGJ31v+F3Ju8XXo983BWvJcdgx/oCGYmXmGgNSfORt0jiAfYoEIwbpuw PrGzy3Y8LV5NzMbjwtZxroziAbF5nItR6xgf+fR+Ba3XRB/YaUXYReSYU+fz4ZUfohTg Whgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00OtTdgk/yertkR7Lv0Mjaz/bzOTru4vEwc1xdxSQ6v/4kyA6FJwE8CJXzFrnkyjElKcATOt6nX2JnS9Q==
X-Received: by 10.107.182.70 with SMTP id g67mr11234081iof.120.1479712105458; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.37.82 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:08:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D96EB1EE-A7C6-4C21-B1AC-1D0A5F8547E8@rfc1035.com>
References: <1479102464.995918272@apps.rackspace.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1611170410140.28374@bofh.nohats.ca> <D96EB1EE-A7C6-4C21-B1AC-1D0A5F8547E8@rfc1035.com>
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:08:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EC4v5U1tcw3OTd7j2D0KNWveNhsUSGc6c=NvX9VhtRLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114abc806a71100541ca52ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/EaLY-AagtnbUxNTRne5n7QGA5jg>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Dane WG <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Second WGLC draft-ietf-dane-smime
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:08:28 -0000

I've read this document and I support publication.

I'm more inclined to publish as Experimental, but I'm not beholden to the
correct flavor.

tim



On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
> > On 17 Nov 2016, at 09:19, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> >
> > I am in favour of publishing this document as an Experimental RFC.
>
> I support publication of this document too: don't care which flavour of
> RFC is chosen for it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email