Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym

[Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]>]

Viktor Dukhovni <[e-mail]> writes:

>>    _666._tcp.first.example.   TLSA 3       1    1        {blob}
>>    _666._tcp.first.example.   TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob}
>>
>>    Something needs to be said for that case; what would an existing
>>    implementation do?  drop both? take one?  Either way, it should be
>>    discussed/mentioned.
>
> I'm confused I thought these were just user friendly names...  The
> wire format of the DNS TLSA record is surely unchanged.  In which
> case it is impossible to publish the second form, it is just an
> input format in documentation (and perhaps source form zone files
> in supporting DNS servers), but not a wire format.

I did actually mean to respond to that and say such, because I realized
that shortly afterward.  Sorry.

(though the zone file is still affected, I don't know of any software
that does partial reads of zone files and only takes the records it can understand)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Parsons