Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 03 October 2013 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FBB21F9A90 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6OcM-YQSsm4 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3061621F8C3E for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-19-31.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.19.31]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6ECF23B28; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <20130919201216.14866.61161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EACEEB05-2023-4F76-A6FE-A9B2FDC0AA59@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:31:24 -0700
In-Reply-To: <EACEEB05-2023-4F76-A6FE-A9B2FDC0AA59@kumari.net> (Warren Kumari's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:18:39 -0400")
Message-ID: <0lpprmumeb.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "dane@ietf.org list" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 20:49:22 -0000
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> writes: Looks like a good start and thanks for writing it Olafur! But it's not ready for publication without some cleanup. Too many standard-things are missing, such as acronym expansion and I'd feel guilty passing it to the RFCEditors without us having caught such things. Nits: 1) handle any case use in the input> The expectation is that by using ^^^^^^ ?????? 2) my alternate suggested should descriptions (I like the acronyms themselves): +-------+----------+-------------------------------------+-----------+ | Value | Acronym | Short Description | Reference | +-------+----------+-------------------------------------+-----------+ | 0 | PKIX-TA | PKIX Validated CA Reference | [RFC6698] | | 1 | PKIX-EE | PKIX Validated End-Entity Reference | [RFC6698] | | 2 | DANE-TA | Validation TA Reference | [RFC6698] | | 3 | DANE-EE | Domain-issued certificate Reference | [RFC6698] | | 4-254 | | Unassigned | | | 255 | PrivCert | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698] | +-------+----------+-------------------------------------+-------------+ Table 1: TLSA Certificate Usages 3) intro text (1 sentence?) to sections needed and expansion of other acronyms earlier in the document (PKIX, EE, ) 4) ideally space align the section 3 records inserted one space here v _666._tcp.first.example. TLSA PKIX-CA CERT SHA2-512 {blob} _666._tcp.second.example. TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob} 5) security considerations There is definitely something to consider if someone publishes both name records along with number records, and the client only parses number records. What happens with this: _666._tcp.first.example. TLSA 3 1 1 {blob} _666._tcp.first.example. TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob} Something needs to be said for that case; what would an existing implementation do? drop both? take one? Either way, it should be discussed/mentioned. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons
- [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-registry-acron… internet-drafts
- [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Andreas Schulze
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Yoav Nir
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… James Cloos
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… James Cloos
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… James Cloos
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Mark Andrews
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Stephen Kent
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-regi… Jim Schaad