Re: [Danish] Charter Text and the Problem Statement

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]> wrote:
    >> I'm very happy to hear that you're interested in how EAP-TLS will fit
    >> with this effort and I have no objection to including this in the
    >> charter, as long as the chairs are OK with it.

    > It does seem to me that EAP-TLS should be considered after the other
    > parts of the problem space have a good start, unless that someone has a
    > good case for why they have to be simultaneously worked on.  And there
    > is nothing wrong with making charter items that outline a series of
    > things to do.  I'd suggest that based on discussions to date, it sounds
    > like there are now three major sections, none of which are huge, to work
    > on:

    > 1. An architecture document
    > 2. Base protocol documents
    > 3. EAP-TLS and other immediate follow on items, if there are agreements
    > now this this really should be the next step (otherwise rechartering
    > when 1 and 2 are done and decide on priorities then)

I agree 100% with this approach.
I think that using EAP-TLS with client side certificates for network access
could be a really useful thing.  But, that it should come afterward as a
milestone.

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide