IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] On (not) moving forward

"Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Thu, 31 March 2016 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E46212D52F for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id blR12uUEyA7y for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF85612D0AE for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from healthyao-PC (unknown [218.241.103.113]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0DZ4Di3wfxW+uhRCQ--.56339S2; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:20:39 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:20:35 +0800
From: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <473d619b6c614fceab703c34623afe37@NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com> <BDA80845-43DB-43EC-B371-DD1770A604CA@vpnc.org> <56F8F033.40209@mozilla.org> <CAL0qLwadNjhWVNOCxdypyRZ9yyhuvPWHKCPpb1Ub49y3QT-Hnw@mail.gmail.com> <F65E8756-3FB4-40CD-8FD7-77E2979DDBC6@vpnc.org> <56F9E01D.4050007@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <03217F5F-2A2E-47BF-BDFB-23A50008C440@vpnc.org> <CAL0qLwZutfDY+LKWRnyzFDnjtxzkqEdObx1LXpZR872ng1Vxxg@mail.gmail.com>, <56FC9716.5000407@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2016033114193325730975@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart718823612726_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0DZ4Di3wfxW+uhRCQ--.56339S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrZrW8KFWrZFy3tFWDGr1UAwb_yoWfXrc_u3 ykJr1DXa4fCr9agwnxtF4rtFs0gw4Y9F1rJws5Zwn5G345XFs7XF9Fgr9a9F1rKwsagFnx Grs7J34xAa4SgjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb3xYjsxI4VW3JwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF0I0E 4I0vr24lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4 IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxMxkIecxE wVAFwVW8AwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1l IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWUJVWrZr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UMVCEFcxC0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvf C2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8RT5JUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/Gykx-QTEXKUvkjROSoy_3iQvmY8>
Cc: dbound <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] On (not) moving forward
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 06:20:42 -0000



From: Martin J. Dürst
Date: 2016-03-31 11:18
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Paul Hoffman
CC: dbound@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dbound] On (not) moving forward


>> A desire to interoperate, I would imagine.  I would want to pick the same
>> one other operators will use, and that other clients will use.  Otherwise,
>> to be sure of participation, I have to implement all three.
>
>Yes indeed. Also, increased choice increases the risk that the answer to 
>"which one to choose" is "none" or "let's wait and see".
>

I think that "Choose none, wait and see" is not a problem. 
 This kind of patient user can wait for the standard track solution and then deploy it. 

"Experimental " indicates that some users (pioneers) will use and taste them first, and then decide which solution is better based on usage experience, which will help the standard track rfc to be published.


Jiankang Yao

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email