IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dc] draft-khasnabish-vmmi-problems-00.txt

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 January 2012 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D609B21F85F0 for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o7zKyPz1SlTS for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8113121F85EF for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwc12 with SMTP id wc12so1593405obb.31 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=k6HqxlRYLZWgiBJhmioo2xGG7j4G+e6oxs39TSnjdD8=; b=IEGqjexQ1ARHbGbqLOMh7K1J+D2MD8lphyWly2KVrqxx2Sk2DS7QNmWG8xlOpzVkeT KpANjQ8HW0Smg7d/S/VEGI1oZ6n7GMz2gwc0D17t9m1y1/7vadjn+04Dn4dyXwSyiW90 U7IgWocDAOrudcPm5QfU49p3L6blTJ8csvza8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.75.65 with SMTP id a1mr28329766obw.32.1327101495223; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.28.196 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F19034E.1070802@gmail.com>
References: <CAH==cJxfmae0u0bSF4cn_haLgY1T-vnw2102PApzYtj5Aty=GQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANtnpwhFJ746ooi9GUCxfBqsOXu14hDka0D9inhh5pPq3U_ZTA@mail.gmail.com> <201201171540.q0HFeNan008591@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CANtnpwjexDPazOXLYHHjn3+JDi-o49Bv5ptDExAZHAA8Ra2m-A@mail.gmail.com> <201201191419.q0JEJTLF010649@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <1326989277.2513.4.camel@ecliptic.extremenetworks.com> <618BE8B40039924EB9AED233D4A09C5102CB2291@XMB-BGL-416.cisco.com> <406B8B5D-E1E5-4DF4-8DE2-D7D2A699430A@asgaard.org> <4F18CE61.6030002@gmail.com> <618BE8B40039924EB9AED233D4A09C5102CB2330@XMB-BGL-416.cisco.com> <4F18EF4A.3060308@gmail.com> <618BE8B40039924EB9AED233D4A09C5102CB234C@XMB-BGL-416.cisco.com> <4F18FB72.2090900@joelhalpern.com> <618BE8B40039924EB9AED233D4A09C5102CB2380@XMB-BGL-416.cisco.com> <4F19034E.1070802@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHTbxB=QYC3Qw0ybL=5RN7VefSENV4iiBBOpXbCn58oi=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: dc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dc] draft-khasnabish-vmmi-problems-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Data Center Mailing List <dc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc>
List-Post: <mailto:dc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:18:19 -0000

On 1/19/12, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/19/12 8:52 PM, Ashish Dalela (adalela) wrote:
>> Hypervisor control is in the hypervisor manager. Switch control is in
>> the network control plane. These are parallel silos, that don't
>> interact.
>
> It seems to me that you're implying that we can't put protocols on
> the hypervisor - is that correct?
Hi Melinda,

An interesting thing to note is that the more the functionality you
put in the hypervisor, the more you stress the single point of failure
in the virtualized system.

Thanks,
Vishwas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email