[Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 09 September 2020 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295043A0C73; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>, eagros@dolby.com, shwethab@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <159968057967.8403.2899880746166280041@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:43:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/KHREH4ipefi6izlbJEa14B4VXLI>
Subject: [Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:43:00 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Shwetha for the OpsDir review, it was helpful to me for knowing where to focus my review. I think it would be nice if the document had a bit more text around the (lack of) issues caused by: "It is important to note that this document differs from [RFC4448] where a sequence number of zero (0) is used to indicate that the sequence number check algorithm is not used." I had to re-read this a few times and then spend some time trying to figure out what happens with implementations that follow RFC4448; as far as I can tell nothing bad happens, but having an extra sentence or two reassuring readers of this would be nice.
- [Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ie… Warren Kumari via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draf… Balázs Varga A