Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Mon, 18 December 2006 20:33 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwPBM-0003qX-Pu; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:56 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwPBK-0003qQ-Ny for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:54 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwPBI-0002Mc-Ei for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:54 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2006 12:33:52 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,185,1165219200"; d="scan'208"; a="48899990:sNHT47431900"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBIKXqBs008898; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:52 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kBIKXpOt026392; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:47 -0500
Received: from kkinnear-wxp.cisco.com ([10.86.242.241]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:46 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20061218153239.0316f410@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: kkinnear@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:33:44 -0500
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents
In-Reply-To: <C1AC4089.32C60%rdroms@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2006 20:33:46.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[D16A6580:01C722E3]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2132; t=1166474032; x=1167338032; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kkinnear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Kim=20Kinnear=20<kkinnear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dhcwg]=20WG=20last=20calls=20on=20several=20WG=20doc uments |Sender:=20 |To:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms@cisco.com>,=20dhcwg=20<dhcwg@ietf.org>; bh=W+Xht4NfYfK+o0/sASY+Welc9RRklNR97OQnMJL+UE4=; b=CBiQHFt0dz1Bkm8OKh9V15bXY3lX8lFeITBT7mGj6UMh7KUHkpw2DwCghC0VTDcvtMzKwcCg FX7UlOusOBPkIcDcnUJCXocwIpJXhKXzeToi4xgfyJGAA25to3u2ghsv;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=kkinnear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17
Cc: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org


I support moving forward all four of these drafts.  This is a
"positive ACK" for all four drafts.

As I'm one of the authors of the last two, my response is perhaps
of less value, but at least on the first two it might be worth
something.

Thanks -- Kim


At 12:56 PM 12/18/2006, Ralph Droms wrote:
>3rd try - So far, we've only received responses as summarized below.  We
>need additional positive support (from others than draft authors!) to move
>forward with these draft.
>
>- Ralph
>
>=====
>
>We need to confirm WG consensus in support of holding WG last calls on
>several dhc WG documents that were discussed at the WG meeting in San Diego.
>
>The first four of these documents are:
>
>draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-01
>  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Assignment Notification (RAAN) Option
>      Yes - Fred Templin
>      Yes - David Hankins
>      Yes - John Brzozowski
>      Yes - Bernie Volz (author)
>
>draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00
>  DHCPv6 Server Reply Sequence Number Option
>
>      Yes - Fred Templin
>      No opinion - David Hankins
>      Yes - John Brzozowski
>      Yes - Bernie Volz (author)
>
>draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ero-00
>  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Echo Request Option
>
>      No opinion - Fred Templin
>      Yes - David Hankins
>      Yes - John Brzozowski (author)
>      Yes - Bernie Volz (author)
>
>draft-ietf-dhc-dhcvp6-leasequery-00
>  DHCPv6 Leasequery
>
>      No opinion - Fred Templin
>      Yes - David Hankins
>      Yes - John Brzozowski (author)
>      Yes - Bernie Volz (author)
>
>If you have any objections to a WG last call for any of these documents,
>please respond to the mailing list.  If you are in agreement that these
>documents are ready for WG last call, send a positive ACK to the mailing
>list so we can assess support for those last calls.  We will review the
>responses received by Mon, Nov 27 and initiate the supported WG last calls
>at that time.
>
>- Ralph
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg