[dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Tue, 21 November 2006 11:30 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmTpi-00024G-Uo; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:34 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmTph-00021G-4u for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:33 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmTpe-00029g-QB for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:33 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2006 03:30:30 -0800
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kALBUTlR006065; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:29 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kALBUTDM014064; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.118]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:28 -0500
Received: from 10.82.242.105 ([10.82.242.105]) by xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.118]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:30:28 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:32 -0500
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C1884D88.30380%rdroms@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: WG last calls on several WG documents
Thread-Index: AccNYHQlso1p9HlTEduEPQARJOT6eg==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2006 11:30:28.0893 (UTC) FILETIME=[724BA4D0:01C70D60]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1518; t=1164108629; x=1164972629; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdroms@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms@cisco.com> |Subject:=20WG=20last=20calls=20on=20several=20WG=20documents |Sender:=20 |To:=20dhcwg=20<dhcwg@ietf.org>; bh=+NlK1xCwJVDQU2s2bvGw4dA59Yij9cDSFSXk+MOLZq0=; b=mXlyyZdjxrHVgMBjWSD1I/o4aL4zOo/0NG+tMS6xCM5Qwil/BjvusZrCc1ULXk6UJBrQcQD+ rVRGjDH5FheFwRBTxxooe0zkPXUeBW1mM8J/3qWWIFv0ETmnAqaaeA7V;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=rdroms@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

2nd try - I know this is a holiday week in the US; so far, we've only
received one response.  If we don't hear more support for these drafts, we
will have to abandon them

- Ralph

=====

We need to confirm WG consensus in support of holding WG last calls on
several dhc WG documents that were discussed at the WG meeting in San Diego.

The first four of these documents are:

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-01
  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Assignment Notification (RAAN) Option

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00
  DHCPv6 Server Reply Sequence Number Option

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ero-00
  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Echo Request Option

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcvp6-leasequery-00
  DHCPv6 Leasequery

If you have any objections to a WG last call for any of these documents,
please respond to the mailing list.  If you are in agreement that these
documents are ready for WG last call, send a positive ACK to the mailing
list so we can assess support for those last calls.  We will review the
responses received by Mon, Nov 27 and initiate the supported WG last calls
at that time.

There are two other documents that were discussed at the WG meeting, which
are not quite ready for WG consensus on last call:

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-00
  Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages
  Requires editorial update to indicate it revises RFC 3315

draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-04
  Subnet Allocation Option
  Need to review IPR claims related to this document

- Ralph


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg