Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-05 - how to proceed?

Thomas Huth <THUTH@de.ibm.com> Thu, 22 October 2009 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <THUTH@de.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308D23A672E for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.646, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FS60AcyWIjef for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (mtagate5.de.ibm.com [195.212.17.165]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABA83A68DB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d12nrmr1507.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1507.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.1]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9M7Yr1W017079 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:34:53 GMT
Received: from d12av05.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av05.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.216]) by d12nrmr1507.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9M7YrwK1937622 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:34:53 +0200
Received: from d12av05.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av05.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9M7Yqr0027348 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:34:52 +0200
Received: from d12ml072.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12ml072.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.166.115]) by d12av05.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id n9M7YpB3027310 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:34:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4ADD70CB.2080409@ucd.ie>
References: <200910062234.AAA07005@TR-Sys.de> <AD61797F-DB2D-4889-8888-5339521ADE8F@nominum.com> <OF029AB4A7.6EEA954A-ONC125764B.004E95CE-C125764B.00536F30@de.ibm.com> <FBD14811-7C9A-4FCB-8707-071A7CA12B96@nominum.com> <OF73909874.9B93FADE-ONC1257653.002E96C8-C1257653.00302A9F@de.ibm.com> <589F59F0-3E17-44FF-8918-FED51F03EE4D@nominum.com> <4ADC156D.1070709@ucd.ie> <669B95F2-FA8F-47AA-AB8A-4292DDB1A4EF@nominum.com> <4ADD70CB.2080409@ucd.ie>
X-KeepSent: 2692FAA8:2F4AF98C-C1257657:002954C1; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008
Message-ID: <OF2692FAA8.2F4AF98C-ONC1257657.002954C1-C1257657.00298474@de.ibm.com>
From: Thomas Huth <THUTH@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:33:28 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12ML072/12/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 22/10/2009 09:34:52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-05 - how to proceed?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:35:17 -0000

Niall.oReilly+lists@ucd.ie wrote on 20/10/2009 10:11:55:
>
> Ted Lemon wrote:
>  > [...] DNS already
>  > specifies a load balancing mechanism for names that return multiple
>  > A or AAAA records.
>
>    The online version of the (4th edition of the) "Cricket book"
>    points out, "Note that this is really load distribution, not
>    load balancing [...]".
>
>    I'm not aware of any DNS-related RFC which "specifies a
>    load-balancing mechanism".
>

There is maybe no standard for this available, but according to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_robin_DNS :

"Methods exist to overcome such limitations. For example, modified DNS
servers (such as lbnamed) can routinely poll mirrored servers for
availability and load factor. If a server does not reply as required, the
server can be temporarily removed from the DNS pool, until it reports that
it is once again operating within specifications. "

That sounds like real load-balancing to me.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards,
   Thomas Huth
                                                                           
    IBM Deutschland                 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:        
    Research & Development GmbH     Martin Jetter                          
    Schönaicher Str. 220            Geschäftsführung: Erich Baier          
    71032 Böblingen                 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen       
    Tel.: +49-7031-16-2183          Registergericht: Amtsgericht           
                                    Stuttgart, HRB 243294