Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-05

[Thomas Huth <[e-mail]>]

[e-mail] wrote on 06/10/2009 22:39:52:

> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Well, by separating the parameters from the boot file option, it's
enough
> > to specify the parameters once for all boot images (if all take the
same
> > parameters). That's much easier to maintain than if copies of the
> > parameters would be put into the same options as the boot file name
(you
> > would then have to change all options in your DHCP server configuration
> > file if you want to change only the parameters).>
>
> How common do you think it will be to /both/:
>
>    (1) have multiple boot images
>     AND
>    (2) have them all (or several) share the same boot parameters?

In the past years, I've seen a couple of cluster installations with _a lot_
of computers, ... so the scenario is really valid (though it's something
that you might not use at home ;-) )

> It may not seem particularly complex, but as someone involved in
> writing the server side I am glad that it seems like I would not
> have to be on the receiving end of these options (and could just
> send to clients what was administratively configured, thus avoiding
> having to do a lot of special-case work). Introducing a new form of
> linkage between options seems like it could be a bit of a pain for
> implementors, especially of clients.

Well, network booting is not always a straight forward job, so there will
certainly be a a little bit of complexity in these settings, no matter
which way you do it. But the current version of the draft has been
discussed with the folks from the UEFI forum already, and there are
certainly a lot of client firmware implementors there, so I think the
current version can't be that wrong...

> > All in all, I think we're doing the right approach with the latest
version
> > of our draft already. It's also available for more than half a year
now,
> > and so far nobody complained about this yet.
>
> Strictly speaking, Damien just did, so somebody has ... however I
> suspect that you didn't mean to discount what he said. :) I imagine
> this is a subtle translation issue.

No offense! Sorry if I expressed that wrong ... as you might have noticed,
English is not my native language... of course I meant to say, that nobody
complained until the point in time right before Damien did.>


Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards,
   Thomas Huth
                                                                           
    IBM Deutschland                 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:        
    Research & Development GmbH     Martin Jetter                          
    Schönaicher Str. 220            Geschäftsführung: Erich Baier          
    71032 Böblingen                 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen       
    Tel.: [phone]          Registergericht: Amtsgericht           
                                    Stuttgart, HRB 243294