IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-05 - how to proceed?

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 22 October 2009 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295C828C114 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.740, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5ooJj6PtxJd for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D88C3A659B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9MJUgpM022320 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:30:42 -0600
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9MJfVbJ050536 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:41:35 -0600
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9MJfUQA007141 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:41:30 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-246-174.mts.ibm.com [9.65.246.174]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id n9MJfTc2007134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:41:30 -0600
Received: from cichlid (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id n9MJfSV7019188; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:41:29 -0400
Message-Id: <200910221941.n9MJfSV7019188@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
In-reply-to: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB4C2063@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
References: <200910062234.AAA07005@TR-Sys.de><AD61797F-DB2D-4889-8888-5339521ADE8F@nominum.com><OF029AB4A7.6EEA954A-ONC125764B.004E95CE-C125764B.00536F30@de.ibm.com><FBD14811-7C9A-4FCB-8707-071A7CA12B96@nominum.com><OF73909874.9B93FADE-ONC1257653.002E96C8-C1257653.00302A9F@de.ibm.com><589F59F0-3E17-44FF-8918-FED51F03EE4D@nominum.com><4ADC156D.1070709@ucd.ie><669B95F2-FA8F-47AA-AB8A-4292DDB1A4EF@nominum.com><4ADD70CB.2080409@ucd.ie><OF2692FAA8.2F4AF98C-ONC1257657.002954C1-C1257657.00298474@de.ibm.com> <200910221814.n9MIETQR002070@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB4C204C@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com> <200910221921.n9MJLJgW010502@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB4C2063@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com> message dated "Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:33:23 -0400."
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:41:28 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-05 - how to proceed?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:41:39 -0000

> Sigh. I guess I wasn't clear in that I hoped to provoke some netbook
> experts to speak up.

Well, I wasn't all that clear in my first note either! I'm really
hoping for the same. I'd be happy to support load balancing, but only
if was a real requirement coming from the folk who are using netboot
and have experience with it. Otherwise, I'd prefer that we keep things
simple.

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email