Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2013 16:52 UTC
Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5DE21F9298 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.811
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.788, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sx2er-vgPI-w for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (mail-ee0-f51.google.com [74.125.83.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD2821F84E3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c4so2417498eek.10 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yeIn9atIbG3QreBP6qhdj0KG4XfrjJ41DrlMysIP8E4=; b=wxX7gZbvqhTvAGsmAM1/gJRxavP3hit08fUROTRmoul9mSy3gikQcslIiV1AyKBlOg uSn9AthpJKsii1TQAuBrhT9MLAEOZRByvgs+x3v8eeXvXA+ixpCeVzMtnb9/pOd31vnH NCca5vQ5O5mYnJfDYKweBgkXUhUbJXffxJDjUp0TJSWw81J6nW2ai6ipgTI6bX2+OAu9 ik3v2XrIQ3O0ZJL3eABk1KEZLVknpf6ojTgAs+JYg/Db8Fs2gEhAsLVZKI3O1+bghdyh /vnMoq8aDG0fRiu36Ntf+e2BBGM9ECzT0aKBe4mu1olN/AT3YMe/OBCws7NnT2l2O/u3 Orpw==
X-Received: by 10.15.102.3 with SMTP id bq3mr24266369eeb.42.1365439968543; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cd3sm23326954eeb.6.2013.04.08.09.52.46 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5162F5DB.7010404@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:52:43 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E184D2C7A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E184D2C7A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130408185243755
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:52:51 -0000
On 03.04.2013 20:04, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > While I think it is appropriate for the WG to adopt this document, I do have comments on the draft itself. This is a small, but important draft. By clarifying that relays must forward unknown messages it provides forward compatibility with any future extensions that define new message types. We know that there's one around the corner already, but there may be more ahead. It is very useful. I do support adoption of this draft. This is definitely something DHC WG should work on. Fortunately, there's not much work left to be done. Minor comment: I would add in section 3.2 "regardless of the message type in Relay Message option". Tomek
- [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unk… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Qi Sun
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Qiong
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6… Tomek Mrugalski