IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Thu, 18 April 2013 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC6221E80ED for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTbxZbLBPP90 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A8121E8090 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1366250838; x=1367460438; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Z8kemSH8lLFlIz5ApLeRAsL8BqLsksZqF2ZHIRugxjg=; b=gSGczQn6LPcfrsYohofg/iBqK2hbnFG/O37YbxpZzfBjrSr2IGgu0gRE ZUXPDx3lwSHrfJ0hszjp5I7jplz0RMsRJxXNmsILfiH4PGkVY0SUUF0vS w1MDRroGXP3orIshfF38FGb8oSkTW3PSgsnYNEn4FhCHoHEe7TC80wxOe E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEFAKhUb1GtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABQgwY2wFeBARZ0gh8BAQEEAQEBNzQXBAIBCA4DBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAgQBEgiIDAy9TgSNaIEBJhIGgl9hA6gagwuBczU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,496,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="200075412"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2013 02:07:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3I27IU3020307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:07:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.197]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:07:17 -0500
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
Thread-Index: AQHOMJBX3ZPAcYOlEkuhkVqplZfYiJjbUaqQ
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:07:16 +0000
Message-ID: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB22EFC032@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <31BA50D5-3451-49B7-8139-8244A3E90F7A@gmail.com> <515C6627.5060401@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <515C6627.5060401@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.100.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:07:20 -0000

I support adoption of this document.

-Gaurav

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:56 PM
To: dhcwg
Subject: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00

Hi all,
This draft is a side effect of the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 discussions during last IETF meeting. We were somewhat surprised to note that RFC3315 does not clarify how the relays should handle message types that they do not recognize. This draft clarifies that unknown messages should be relayed as usual.

Authors requested adoption call on
draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00. This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail.
If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on 2013-04-17.

Regards,
Bernie & Tomek


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email