Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00

Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B7421F8B0A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3nca3r66i-W for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x234.google.com (mail-vb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAF221F8A4E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w8so1064927vbf.25 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=sFEY8eZeiL0GcN/H9y+VMLtvY+P/kJG/mF4JRBaBDps=; b=jHsumt6wNpSQq+5kRkfOBceEkJGJQ/aGdcjfK3Ow2fCwoRNxFkDQ78PGZahFAkoXe7 TPgUOQd7qZ9Cfb4iap+1g+V1/eF8CnKYIwk5W1NDAE6+457/bQ2YCq2IxYSRJLIU8zk6 rgEQ5jZT9+Aiy5U6zIDOQf1IlDXVwlcdWLDru7bzoSLaqiy9gZaCbN/h06V6XdRAZR5v tqRN+8ngu1k17+Ku7FuJiOa2V9Q03CxduDGbvtmVeFaC/rUlOkt6zINJAnlB7y685YEH +e2I5bX3g9Rr87RjDm19Z8OZOlyIvDa0/W6NuJ0PqcBIdaHfNL3HrEr0u0frnol7wYXZ V5fA==
X-Received: by 10.58.212.8 with SMTP id ng8mr4166605vec.25.1366188956198; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.224.133 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AA19456@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E184D2C7A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <5162F5DB.7010404@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AA19456@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:55:16 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH3bfAA=uYb6Bk5zszbcg19onshRFt3GG+qkxd8hVZ5-YyMZXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6af506e6e7f04da8aa7f7"
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0000

Hi all,

I'm in favor of adoption this work.

Best wishes
Qiong


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> wrote:

> I do support the adoption of this draft. Useful work. However, I do think
> this draft should go further to include both unknown message and unknown
> OPTIONS.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sheng
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >Of Tomek Mrugalski
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:53 AM
> >To: dhcwg
> >Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on
> >draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
> >
>  >On 03.04.2013 20:04, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> >> While I think it is appropriate for the WG to adopt this document, I do
> have
> >comments on the draft itself.
> >This is a small, but important draft. By clarifying that relays must
> >forward unknown messages it provides forward compatibility with any
> >future extensions that define new message types. We know that there's
> >one around the corner already, but there may be more ahead.
> >
> >It is very useful. I do support adoption of this draft. This is
> >definitely something DHC WG should work on. Fortunately, there's not
> >much work left to be done.
> >
> >Minor comment: I would add in section 3.2 "regardless of the message
> >type in Relay Message option".
> >
> >Tomek
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >dhcwg mailing list
> >dhcwg@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>



-- 
==============================================
Qiong Sun
China Telecom Beijing Research Institude


Open source code:
lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/*
PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/ *
===============================================