IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C983E21F939C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 02:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYvMC0uiZ+3Q for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 02:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD121F9399 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 02:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQJ76030; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:45:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:45:31 +0100
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:45:36 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.76]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:45:30 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
Thread-Index: AQHONHmGQ0BnpZkv4UCeA7Q/OzRVkpjXEiGw
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:45:29 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AA19456@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E184D2C7A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <5162F5DB.7010404@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5162F5DB.7010404@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:45:42 -0000

I do support the adoption of this draft. Useful work. However, I do think this draft should go further to include both unknown message and unknown OPTIONS.

Best regards,

Sheng

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Tomek Mrugalski
>Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:53 AM
>To: dhcwg
>Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on
>draft-csl-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-3315update-00
>
>On 03.04.2013 20:04, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>> While I think it is appropriate for the WG to adopt this document, I do have
>comments on the draft itself.
>This is a small, but important draft. By clarifying that relays must
>forward unknown messages it provides forward compatibility with any
>future extensions that define new message types. We know that there's
>one around the corner already, but there may be more ahead.
>
>It is very useful. I do support adoption of this draft. This is
>definitely something DHC WG should work on. Fortunately, there's not
>much work left to be done.
>
>Minor comment: I would add in section 3.2 "regardless of the message
>type in Relay Message option".
>
>Tomek
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email