IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 29 December 2023 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A4AC14F5F1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:05:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3SJ7YR560oA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED321C14F5E2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E631800F; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:05:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EKXDokcR73Bj; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:05:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38C21800C; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:05:13 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1703869513; bh=YkCpn3iTYHnyuERvJjY+m60W5CrZi8+LqvLRNwPg66A=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pAaqeoeYV4lxEP+3icIkrOUEwqwqW08B6C9kX15Mg7GMKExcnHxTH7CB4WnkjFLHN wHqesoUYICRdsXzgLWUjT4UHgYTk+OEw7D1e8aWnu9hP8RXbccf377p7wYe9tELg1I Bbyx34xA/FhJ6aK6sSqqG+YiFqDxVretH5//AkFx8N85AsUYHkdQrtzZ7XB9X010cW FS9JTQymkd92m0867v6mw+FAq1RsREeyQynX2VQTVVlKvECKXV4+si4+BcuOFVK+Dc BLuHvrHiDPI8xzUpnO9pDK+o0xqffrMQ2fquL+UN7TA4LDhdjiaKL1+cfjr8TMqhBQ 8B/xn/Db0TaaQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F24A1BF; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:05:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=h10kWEQkynMF4qDQBBrMLGOxDOE_tAc4AYnob1jw8qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACyFTPE0+aV35JgVCL62T3NKL_tFkxuvM=Wfq0xpcw5_Ra-u_A@mail.gmail.com> <15477.1703435979@localhost> <CAFU7BATNwBjbY7k_i7ft8nf2b_HhRqV2yyd4LKc=ou1kLmjwXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=h10kWEQkynMF4qDQBBrMLGOxDOE_tAc4AYnob1jw8qg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:05:13 -0500
Message-ID: <23223.1703869513@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/HK9wrhUSBFVUEKaYr4YUccwrKFY>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:05:19 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > I think the SNAC use case would have to be clearly motivated: someone would
    > have to be asking for it not because they think it should happen in theory,
    > but because they need it to deploy stub networks in their specific
    > environment. Personally I’m skeptical that there is a need for this, but it
    > will be interesting to see.

If it were to happen, how would you like the stub router to behave if it
receives ADDR-REG-INFORM?  That's all we have to say right now.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email