IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 29 December 2023 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0333C151527 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:10:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fz5XbQ1FvsoJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961F1C151522 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67f9f6ca479so48936186d6.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:10:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1703869848; x=1704474648; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YewMIvgt3E//9Kvi5RvobGlOlIu82HjENPA8aGsLbek=; b=h4Um5rMvPMsBx/Q29BAal1NxTzQarjzbCkWC/S3vubQsvGhT+m0vBdYrdzilKNd1iO 1ts4h1fVvwxu7/GEy9niVfAZQi/oxz0hlOUsFTyeIGOzq7D4k23uqhisvKrtbWPyFIk+ XlVF/546guNDhPHFnQm/CU8ava06hkxDdVRO1J6b0h62D6XQ+ISFHqmxRfPXp8X7NtZY xLUQFn3JSav/meT909QWjun8W/oJXp6yzJoxoDwivTJ+U8RiosXN5YSY+dcMSzH4O3T+ 9RAM6OxRR/bteGr9Mc015AdidrSzSLPferNCYR0HKQjg3kpXeHzwGDiuCgFnGY2Xr+Jw qv7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703869848; x=1704474648; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YewMIvgt3E//9Kvi5RvobGlOlIu82HjENPA8aGsLbek=; b=UG3LKkcLEjJVlJffhQF7OpMnk41T1yCGFZYbV+loSr8VWs20im8QvCggFUGvx6oP3S VmOrWlRYS92PJE89cfLyeHFyeH+w1tnGETFMan5JXn0nmxXnT+7mvWeTDi8N+Gj2CaQg 3yaYeDzeLe/oWpkN8xpu86co7p0n6gI+Mm8x+X4APDUsE4Zsleu3HR8a9FhYlnEHxn0K ACQ1AeADeT4npmrNeAMEUZH9LIVJbnmBpGIIawaUheqKXAUI5jJcJKQeEa7lx88u6zRp DLAvCusgdqwjVUWWLyACcXnuk4L0GBO5+1f/te7uhbnlkQNbaMFvtwbsa8UK25cBG9lX UFSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywTTclpa8asYm9YmR3B13mub+Z+Vp/631OnzNXAWroYF1XEkcj dEYj/sxa//e/LyKGo4BqIGwlJnRk0i5dCofgP7NB6dpZTSQ22Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG6RPXdGK00lIaz4hwYiIPr3nwvTvP7VaIna5sbaVRkBdAb7VS0k6p7WPdRLq7HK6phmEmREWlLKC/g5W5zAsM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:501c:b0:67a:b419:530f with SMTP id jo28-20020a056214501c00b0067ab419530fmr17813540qvb.9.1703869848555; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:10:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACyFTPE0+aV35JgVCL62T3NKL_tFkxuvM=Wfq0xpcw5_Ra-u_A@mail.gmail.com> <15477.1703435979@localhost> <CAFU7BATNwBjbY7k_i7ft8nf2b_HhRqV2yyd4LKc=ou1kLmjwXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=h10kWEQkynMF4qDQBBrMLGOxDOE_tAc4AYnob1jw8qg@mail.gmail.com> <23223.1703869513@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <23223.1703869513@localhost>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:10:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kHOqvqkBmCVG+=53Fp7htAtNfgCch_VU4i2sRnaSSDQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000112fd6060da91d30"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/jCX5Rh5I_VuXZcy2spySe_X7VBY>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:10:51 -0000

How would it receive that?  It’s not going to do an information request,
currently. The only dhcp behavior currently specified is that it will
attempt an IA_PD.

Op vr 29 dec 2023 om 12:05 schreef Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
>

>
> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>     > I think the SNAC use case would have to be clearly motivated:
> someone would
>     > have to be asking for it not because they think it should happen in
> theory,
>     > but because they need it to deploy stub networks in their specific
>     > environment. Personally I’m skeptical that there is a need for this,
> but it
>     > will be interesting to see.
>
> If it were to happen, how would you like the stub router to behave if it
> receives ADDR-REG-INFORM?  That's all we have to say right now.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email