IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 26 December 2023 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB685C14CF1B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6HzmIG7kVkJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C24C14CE2E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275C1800D; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:59:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bN6rH_ApEDwb; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:59:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2E71800C; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:59:42 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1703631582; bh=5x/9cgvnzXbQIojVbicC8i5w6C2h64HKJP6E5R+yDMU=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=JpDiQNU2emAoDJXK1sVyPzo8K1EasMPP+PzhEu/5B+oVxSlxJ8i/bDvhDLiz7o4+m drEddrwL8i4yuxFqwKyeHdReZgBPs3Py5vjTw0otGYPPYBDR2AZH2JWQ+a1yui2uRR WlMeNHAuC/WAb7gRaa8Urpv4eEEWyXsFPFs22PqsO/F28dHijK/0nPWytoRZvhRwez g+NlIfp+DTk8czyVg243gp26EmtcPoW6p2muKQ0FjcK3qayOy531m6P5c2K3xdbo4d f88hjQE4aEw/V/bO8LZAIjXtaqabFcHKKVXobXoI4x1WOZlv+AbOdJgE+mnm7Y1+yW CKqqz3610WjSQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B505E16E; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:59:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>
cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, Daryll Swer <contact=40daryllswer.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C90F00A7-B216-43AA-87B0-E03524EFD75F@gmail.com>
References: <15477.1703435979@localhost> <C90F00A7-B216-43AA-87B0-E03524EFD75F@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:59:42 -0500
Message-ID: <22596.1703631582@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kBuNye6jjrUUrdkapeH237xzApU>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 22:59:51 -0000

Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:
    > If you want to report upstream, why not just relay the notification?

a) because often the local server actually needs to keep it's own database.

b) because it might need to filter based upon which addresses are being
   reported about.  For instance, filter out ULAs, but keep GUAs.

c) it seems to me like the local server should perhaps be taking
responsability for the delivery.

but, I agree that relaying upstream might be the better solution.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email