Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter

The idea behind "complete or terminate..." was to be conscious about the 
progress (or lack thereof) on expired documents.  Mostly an explicit and 
visible sanity check with the authors to find out if progress will be made 
in the future (with a pretty low bar on "progress").

There may be some docs that the WG wants to take off the charter (but I 
doubt it).

- Ralph

At 02:34 PM 10/24/2002 -0400, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > The posted charter has been revised based on Bernie's input...
>
>Looks pretty good overall.
>
>But one thing seems odd:
>
> > Complete or terminate work on DHCP ...
>
>And then lists all the relevant WG drafts.
>
>I think everyone will agree that the majority of the listed IDs stay
>as WG items. Maybe a small number should be terminated?
>
>We should have the discussion now about which documents are in and
>which are no longer needed/appropriate. After all, the (re)chartering
>process is about aligning the charter with the work being done.
>
>There may be cases where there is a specific document that we don't
>really know today what to do with it, that's OK, so long as it is
>clear in the milestone (or charter) that the first order of business
>is to figure out what to do with it (i.e., before additional work is
>done on it).
>
>But I don't think the charter should leave it so open ended as to
>which IDs may or may not be kept.
>
>Thomas
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg