IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 20 August 2012 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1B321F85A5 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuwwSs85q4pk for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C3E21F85A0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDJwr4IWSEK2h90szFMdcufI4OAGDwsE@postini.com; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:27 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A561B8322 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCEB4190043; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:15:27 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
Thread-Index: AQHNdqZP3dOUnDeDJkKs3MsN2OTAhpddHmiAgAXOj4CAADyqAIAAAYGA///WWJE=
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:15:25 +0000
Message-ID: <F473ACCD-3D1B-4964-A6E4-E3910671CD13@nominum.com>
References: <0AE8374B-0E04-48FF-B71D-2EE8FAAC9ED1@nominum.com> <93E6DE37-FD02-42BC-B4E9-DF0BBCD06C02@nominum.com> <74DBBDC4-9827-4141-AB37-AE9256ACFF15@employees.org> <01634C66-161A-4C56-BD24-2F2180581D98@nominum.com>, <A5CD8E90-D939-42EE-91FB-7A364B7BE10B@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <A5CD8E90-D939-42EE-91FB-7A364B7BE10B@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:15:28 -0000

On Aug 20, 2012, at 2:44 PM, "Ole Trøan" <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> is there anyone who thinks that we should _not_ make multiple stateful options work in a single DHCP session?

That's certainly not what I am getting at!  :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email