IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Mon, 13 August 2012 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA64421F86A8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLKdsRK9zLvF for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3F421F86A4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1023; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344826667; x=1346036267; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ORwFSUuYKJ3nlXKISgrOBWU+n9CYkc09Av293BoQ1gU=; b=gXLHoohSoXnh5xaSIFMwlt/YmA3z/7/BkDQ4Kb7sk0ta1o7V08x6YclI td25o5Iqmp2o+0iF94hADntEtgHO45si0lCnVFo6+fmbEl1yQJJ+G5/wo bpGt3hizwwr6WVm0puyWuw/pLbyOQts54Bd6z13okvYFGOkmof4hzdKU6 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGFsKFCtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABDuXiBB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BJzQXBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHJwsUCQgCBAESCBMHh2sLlwufKASLEoVRYAOjdYFmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,757,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="107872061"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2012 02:57:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7D2vkvU015946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:57:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.246]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:57:46 -0500
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
Thread-Index: AQHNdqZP3dOUnDeDJkKs3MsN2OTAhpdXEVvg
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:57:45 +0000
Message-ID: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0D01D3@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <0AE8374B-0E04-48FF-B71D-2EE8FAAC9ED1@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <0AE8374B-0E04-48FF-B71D-2EE8FAAC9ED1@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.104.48]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19108.001
x-tm-as-result: No--31.445200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:57:47 -0000

I support this document.

Thanks,
Gaurav

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:45 AM
To: dhc WG
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00

The authors have requested a working group last call.   The document describes some problems that exist in the way DHCP clients handle multiple stateful options, and proposes a solution that unifies the client state machine to accommodate these issues.

This document could use additional review, so please take the time to read it over and comment on it if you have any comments.   If you are in favor of advancing the document, please say so.   If you oppose advancing it, please say so, and say why.   We will evaluate the consensus based on these responses on August 24.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email