Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Sat, 15 September 2012 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A67521F85A8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9015EjNjBr0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7419721F85C3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2741; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347671363; x=1348880963; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6ruRH5mp6EGbPozejbcoISC9bDlBqQl7Ij10lU07rjM=; b=NKu8BA2gS2sNPExqw5EgRCND5IUTGg4JzEGUl0Fg+c5ylIMmGKh0CVMl WCkAofI7AlznfQtUWAE0TKjNojXUKu86FHYkMsh+PHwD6wVUZvkBpisQ7 bIGWCwQROgzA8frn+GA5hBV9DPQSzpY6xUGSf7VRqGsp51Z1VufvOkrxV I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAG3UU1CtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFvAuBB4IgAQEBBBIBJz8MBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHMhQJCAIEAQ0FCBqHa5sAoBuGJIR7hghgA6QZgWmCZoFjNA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,425,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="121867547"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2012 01:09:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8F19KsN017327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:09:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.230]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:09:19 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
Thread-Index: AQHNdqZP3dOUnDeDJkKs3MsN2OTAhpd/JdswgAB/xoD//5GrgIAAeqgAgAsV/xA=
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:09:19 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B8908A7CF@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <0AE8374B-0E04-48FF-B71D-2EE8FAAC9ED1@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F83D1@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <21C54D57-372F-46B0-892B-398919992546@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F857F@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CD3ECABE-12FB-428C-9FFF-078793B32C0E@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD3ECABE-12FB-428C-9FFF-078793B32C0E@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.128]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19182.004
x-tm-as-result: No--29.297800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Ole Troan (otroan)" <otroan@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:09:24 -0000
Ted/Bernie/Ole, Humble apologies I was buried with other priorities and did not check my DHC WG email folder in a while. I actually replied to the xlat document in v6ops during my 10 days of PTO up till the Labor Day. Bernie kindly reminded me this week of this document. Most of my comments have been addressed. Some pending are included below. Why was the CONFIRM message deliberately specified by RFC 3633 as not supported for the IA_PD? It would be good to reply to this question. Otherwise the IESG is likely to ask the same question and the answer to such a question may uncover issues for us. For one, it is easy for a server to respond to a CONFIRM to an IA_MA by just matching the IPv6 address configured on the machine the server is running on. I am always reminded by some authors of RFC 3315 that the server distinctly does not consult its client bindings to respond to a CONFIRM for an IA_NA. The server just relies on the machine IPv6 configuration to compute a status of on-link or not-on-link. Thus why it is not a sea-change to support the CONFIRM for the IA_PD option and we may need to step gingerly? If the server has to respond to a CONFIRM for an IA_PD, the server now consults with its bindings (I think Bernie alluded to in his reply to this thread) which the server did not do before for the IA_NA. Searching thru bindings has delay implications and additional server computations. Or as I had already said in my earlier reply that the server checks what prefixes are configured on the server to determine on-link status. However checking prefixes for IA_PD at a server has to exclude prefixes that are used for allocation of IA_NA. So now the server maintains two types of prefixes. Thus I will try and propose some text over the weekend that IA_PD support in CONFIRM can't suffice with network configuration. Some other data in the server needs checking and we should try and be little specific about the data. Just saying something like "the sever checks network configuration" doesn't cut it for the IA_PD. Let me see what I can do over this weekend and propose some text as to how the server checks for on-link or not for the IA_PD to respond to a CONFIRM. I will also catch up with other emails on this document and reply, if necessary. Regards, Hemant -----Original Message----- From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:22 PM To: Bernie Volz (volz) Cc: dhc WG; Wes Beebee (wbeebee); Hemant Singh (shemant); Ole Troan (otroan) Subject: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 Was that a yes or a no?
- [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-… Hemant Singh (shemant)