Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0A613148B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BlrDRhuhRKfw for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F1E129439 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w1so24294362qtg.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=i7rG1PmFdskNPFOiALhz8M5SoAHBegl7SR6h+iS3YfU=; b=FSidJLVokLvIJXUMAK7i8kWareAnwwjVkwgzcqrqMGi0ijJpyrBNF5Xw2rWqNa9NS9 8XUKRpcF+ZLUZYKkPj2CHlfNToR8dXJiR2bFsw7TJy374GUzP4lgod3ZTct1Y3Xf1xT1 iK8olKx4j1L5MHxMrgp5GTPLCRCL0QlrESbqhityGrREVvhS0lWorQljWtYEpk8YEA2/ T9Ry/0wUo8EbFN3Tz7IxMxdfZz/qC8DFyWmAzKvcjOdjCSRkr2FxdIIX4uM/Wf9uiKWY fZSdFuAStp151tbFK4fCP59/YS5aSxZytX1Oiu1uoQo+BxZKcjkJdnok7fhEWFLKgm4S OWjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=i7rG1PmFdskNPFOiALhz8M5SoAHBegl7SR6h+iS3YfU=; b=dnQRx3QaHVs6m5OIp37yvUXqLo+0VbJvmUPuVazVFN+dQ1QdpbmwNJFXGpBH0OqkrD /n6sfQW34uh0zred3fsZCBXW9lsKinUsjR3hoVb5wlSNikcb8SZ4tE5Fa7bP6yoVv8HI xuwH25Og5VHjw2zWtgZ/70wjLQKAx9zHAXTki5YSJpjyyTQW+N3C62Ng158cthOM4LAa mqorkdtO3VK3pMoAYLhkvCRhVy0cq4HD+CwS/GVj/TU3eTfoaYYGYw7rE1BjSi7CfDmL ffDRUfcuGAzed8wQ6DMuNI5rAiHe3mF9VFSGD57bKcHfWD55vJAvODBlzCMXYR8AfTeD rM6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw12PjAdWxl7o5svVnKgoc1hyGJ+8x+FUOTnglB7ffYeezNSqjK MRpoDX+UE1mdXPOF
X-Received: by 10.55.54.7 with SMTP id d7mr3033379qka.258.1496879136250; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l23sm1823771qtl.24.2017.06.07.16.45.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <C5387B74-FA42-4B26-8AA6-5C41F8FBB0BB@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7B632677-4EDF-4848-8BC4-FB6C72D3E813"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:45:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201706072322.v57NMdgh078025@givry.fdupont.fr>
Cc: =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <201706072322.v57NMdgh078025@givry.fdupont.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/QnWmndEl874FnhAvpUs7oumqLDA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 23:45:39 -0000

On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote:
> => I don't understand your argument: if you send an encrypted packet
> to a box without the proper security association of course it does not
> work. This has nothing to do with IPsec and will happen with DTLS too
> or anything secure protocol which carries DHCP messages.

The relay agent can forward an encrypted payload that it receives.   It can't forward a cleartext payload from an encrypted packet it couldn't decode.